Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com

Hill Publishing Group

Location:Home / Journals / Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science /

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2020.07.003

Aesthetics of Representing Cultural Paradigms in Rushdie

Meenu A. Gupta

Department of English and Cultural Studies, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.

*Corresponding author: Meenu A. Gupta

PDF Downloads
Date: September 8,2020 Hits: 360, How to cite this paper

Abstract

In the contemporary century where the world is metamorphosed to a global vil-lage, the concept of national culture and national literature is certainly belied. The world literature, today, simultaneously represents an important multicultural perspective within individual national literatures as well as more global perspec-tive taking in the phenomena of transculturalism and diaspora confluence. Ray-mond Williams develops a theory of relation between culture at large and cultural products like literature. Culture is manifested in human artifacts and activities such as music, literature, life-style, food, painting, sculpture, theatre and film. It can be said that arts and the world of science with their moral systems come to form culture. These are constantly in a spatio-temporal flux that renders an inex-haustible range of meanings and a catalogue of the elements. In this process of evolution a particular aspect dominates or fades off at some space-time coordi-nate. The pattern of human activity and the symbolic structures give such activi-ties significance and importance. Rushdie, like other postcolonial writers not only reflects upon the political aspects of history but also deconstructs the interrela-tionships between history and individual to delve into the moral and psychological tensions of the native homeland. His novels are the fine example where ethics of the nation are well represented in the aesthetics of his works. The paper is a research work that delves into Rushdie’s novels to look for various cultural representations.

References

Allen, Walter. (1971). Reading a Novel. Great Britain: Penguin, pp. 18-19.

Cundy Catherine. (1994). “Through Childhood’s Window—Haroun and the Sea of Stories”. M. D. Fletcher (ed.), Read-ing Rushdie- Perspectives on the Fiction of Salman Rushdie, Cross Cultures, 16, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi.

Dilip Fernandez. (1984). “Such Angst, Such Loneliness, Such Rootlessness”. Gentleman, Feb. 1984, p. 101.

Durix, J-P. (1994). “‘The Gardener of Stories’—Salman Rushdie’s Haroun and the Sea of Stories”. M. D. Fletcher (ed.), Reading Rushdie —Perspectives on the Fiction of Salman Rushdie, Cross Cultures, 16, Amsterdam/Atlanta, Rodopi.

Featherstone, Mike. (n.d.). “Global Culture: An Introduction”. Global Culture, 2.

Haffenden, John. (1985). “Salman Rushdie.” Novelists in Interview, New York: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, p. 237.

Kirschenbaum, M. (2015). “What is an @uthor?” Los Angeles Review of Books, February 6. lareviewof-books.org/essay/uthor/.

Lukacs, Georg. (1962). The Historical Novel. trans. Hannah and Stanley Mitchell. London: Merlin Press.

Lukacs, Georg. (1968). “The Ideology of Modernism” in David Lodge, ed. 20th Century Literary Criticism: A Reader, London, pp. 465-87.

Ravy, T. (2016). “‘The Man Who Would Be Popular’: An Analysis of Rushdie’s Twitter Feed”. Journal of Common-wealth Literature, 52 (3): 551-562. doi:10.1177/0021989416678284.

Ravy, Tawnya. (2018). “Reframing Salman Rushdie: The Politics of Representation and New Media in Transnational Public Culture.” PhD diss., The George Washington University.

Risam, R. (2017). “Colonial and Postcolonial Digital Humanities Roubdtable”. https://acrl.ala. org/dh/2017/11/02/resource-colonial-and-postcolonial-digital-humanities-roundtable/.

Rushdie, Salman, ed. (1997). The Vintage Book of Indian Writing 1947-97. London: Vintage.

Rushdie, Salman. (1982). Midnight’s Children. New York: Avon.

Rushdie, Salman. (1983a). “The Indian Writer in England.” In The Eye of the Beholder, edited by Maggie Butcher. Lon-don: Commonwealth Institute.

Rushdie, Salman. (1983b). Shame. New Delhi: Picador.

Rushdie, Salman. (1988). The Satanic Verses. London: Viking.

Rushdie, Salman. (1990a). Haroun and the Sea of Stories. New York: Penguin.

Rushdie, Salman. (1990b). Haroun and the Sea of Stories. London: Penguin Granta.

Rushdie, Salman. (1990c). “In Good Faith.” Sunday, 25 Feb.-3 March, p. 27.

Rushdie, Salman. (1991). Imaginary Homelands: Essays and Criticism: 1981-1991. New Delhi: Penguin Viking India.

Rushdie, Salman. (1995). The Moor’s Last Sigh. London: Vintage.

Rushdie, Salman. (1996). “In Defense of the Novel, Yet Again: Fiction has Never Been Safe.” The New Yorker. 24 June and 1 July 1996: 48-55.

Rushdie, Salman. (2000). The Ground Beneath Her Feet. London: Vintage.

Rushdie, Salman. (2001). Fury. London: Jonathan Cape.

Rushdie, Salman. (2005). Shalimar The Clown. London: Jonathan Cape.

Rushdie, Salman. (2008). The Enchantress of Florence. London: Jonathan Cape.

Sandel, Michael J. (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Har-vard University Press.

Teverson, Andrew S. (2001). Twentieth Century Literature, Vol. 47, No.4, Salman Rushdie. (Winter, 2001), pp. 444-466.

Williams, Raymond. (n.d.). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: OUP, pp. 192-3.

Full-Text HTML

Aesthetics of Representing Cultural Paradigms in Rushdie
How to cite this paper: Meenu A. Gupta. (2020) Aesthetics of Representing Cultural Paradigms in Rushdie. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science4(2), 99-108.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2020.07.003

Volumes(Year) & Month

Free HPG Newsletters

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from Hill Publishing Group.

Contact us

Hill Publishing Group

8825 53rd Ave

Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA

E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.