This paper tests Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) with a variant of the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) which conjectures that an association exists among Real Exchange Rate, Interest Rate, and Inflation rate in Turkey. The target goal of this examination is to research to what extent the chosen macroeconomic factors affect the Real Exchange Rate of Turkey by utilizing the Johansen long-run testing approach to deal with co-integration. The paper demonstrates spellbinding measurements. This paper tried the ADF Unit Root test for demonstrating whether board information is fixed or not. By testing the Johansen test for co-integration the paper demonstrates the relationship between Real Exchange Rate, Interest Rate, and Inflation Rate in Turkey. Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) is likewise evolved to test the short-run elements of the Real Exchange Rate work. Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) and Cumulative Sum of Square (CUSUMQ) have been utilized to test the strength of the model. The outcomes show that there is a short-run and long-run relationship among Real Exchange Rate, Inflation Rate, and Interest Rate. The outcomes indicated that the Inflation Rate negatively affects the Real Exchange Rate, however, Interest Rate has a Positive Impact. Also, the Inflation Rate has a free causal relationship with Real Exchange Rate, however, Interest Rate has a unidirectional relationship. This paper recommends the possibility to improve their Real Exchange Rate by diminishing the Inflation Rate and expanding the Interest Rate.
Alba, J. (2005). Purchasing Power Parity and Country. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University, 1-19.
Basher, S. (2007). Another Look at the Null of Stationary Real Exchange Rates: Panel Data with Structural Breaks and Cross-section Dependence. NewYork: Department of Economics, New York University.
Çağlayan, E. (2006). Satın alma gücü paritesinin geçerlili ğini sifir frekansta spektrum tahmincisine dayanan birim kök testleri ile incelenmes. Journal of Economics and Administrative Science, 121-137.
Chi-Wei Su, H.-L. C.-H. (2012). Purchasing power parity for BRICS: Linear and nonlinear unit root tests with stationary covariates. Applied Economics Letters, 1-5.
Cuestas, J. (2013). Purchasing power parity in OECD countries: Nonlinear unit root tests revisite. Economic Modelling, 343-346.
Dornbusch, R. (1985). Purchasing Power Parity. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Hüseyin Kalyoncu, F. K. (2010). The Validity of Purchasing Power Parity Hypothesis in Middle East and Northern Africa Countries. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 125-131.
Ismail Cevis, R. C. (2015). Kırılgan Beşlide Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi (SAGP) Hipotezinin Test Edilmesi. Journal of Yaşar University, 6381-6393.
Joseph D. Alba, D. P. (2005). An Empirical Investigation of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) for Turkey. Journal of Policy Modeling, 989-1000.
P. K. Narayan, S. N. (2009). Evidence on PPP from a cointegration test with multiple structural breaks. Applied Eco-nomics Letters, 5-8.
Sayyan, H. (2005). Satınalma gücü paritesi: Vektör hata giderme modeli yaklaşimi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 96-104.
Tatoğlu, F. (2009). Reel Efektif Döviz Kurunun Durağanlığının Yapısal Kırılmalı Panel Birim Kök Testleri Kullanılarak Sınanması. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 310-323.
Ümit, Ö. (2016). Stationarity of real exchange rates in the “fragile five”: Analysis with structural breaks. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 254-270.
Yıldırım, D. (2017). Empirical investigation of purchasing power parity for Turkey: Evidence from recent nonlinear unit root tests. 39-45: Central Bank Review.