Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com
Location:Home > Journals > The Educational Review, USA > 2019 > 8
Journals
Contact Information
Hill Publishing Group
8825 53rd Ave
Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA
E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

The Educational Review, USA

Assessing written language in Greek: Validity and reliability considerations

Author:Ioanna Talli Date:August 07,2019 Hits:

Abstract

This study aims at contributing to the reading assessment tools for Greek speaking population by evaluating the validity and reliability of decoding and reading comprehension measures. We tested 173 monolingual Greek children (aged 7-10) from elementary school Grades 2, 3, and 4, which were divided into three age groups: (i) 7-8 years, (ii) 8-9 years, (iii) 9-10 years. We employed the following measures: Word decoding measures (WDM): (i) a word and a non-word reading test and (ii) a reading fluency test. Reading comprehension measures (RCM): (i) a standardized reading comprehension test and (ii) a reading comprehension test based on the French test ECoSSe (Epreuve de Compréhension Syntaxico-Sémantique [Test of syntactico-semantic comprehension]).We investigated the convergent validity of these measures and found significant and strong (S & S) correlations between all these measures for the 7-year-old children; for the 8-year-old and 9-year-old groups S & S correlations were only found within each measure category. Furthermore, to investigate the external consistency of these measures we performed test-retest reliability and administered them for a second time after two weeks to a smaller group of 30 individuals (10 for each grade) of this cohort. Correlation analysis indicated S & S correlation. We also investigated internal consistency by performing split-half reliability, which indicated very high estimate for all tests except the second RCM. These results show the interdependence of different aspects of reading abilities in the early stage of reading development.  

References

Anastasiou, D., & Protopapas, A. (2015). Difficulties in lexical stress versus difficulties in segmental phonology among adolescents with dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(1), 31-50.
Byrne, B. (2014). The foundation of literacy: The child's acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Psychology Press.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2011). Matthew effects in young readers: Reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development. Journal of learning disabilities, 44(5), 431-443.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of educational psychology, 96(1), 31-42.
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read?. Cognition, 91(1), 77-111.
Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Gaudreau, P., & Georgiou, G. (2017). Early contribution of morphological awareness to literacy skills across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 1-25.
Diamanti, V., Mouzaki, A., Ralli, A., Antoniou, F., Papaioannou, S., & Protopapas, A. (2017). Preschool phonological and morphological awareness as longitudinal predictors of early reading and spelling development in Greek. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2039.
Ehri, L. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011). The simple view of reading: Is it valid for different types of alphabetic orthographies?. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 553-576.
Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566-580.
Georgiou, G. K., Torppa, M., Manolitsis, G., Lyytinen, H., & Parrila, R. (2012). Longitudinal predictors of reading and spelling across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 321-346.
Gough, P.B., & Tumner, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 1-17.

Jacquier-Roux, M., Valdois, S., & Zorman, M. (2005). Outil de dépistage des dyslexies (ODEDYS). Grenoble: Laboratoire des sciences de l’éducation.
Kendeou, P., Broek, P., Helder, A., & Karlsson, J. (2014). A cognitive view of reading comprehension: implications for reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 10-16.
Kendeou, P., Papadopoulos, T. C., & Spanoudis, G. (2012). Processing demands of reading comprehension tests in young readers. Learning and Instruction, 22(5), 354-367.
Kendeou, P., Van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of educational psychology, 101(4), 765-778.
Khomsi, A. (1999). Epreuve d'évaluation de la compétence en lecture: lecture de mots et compréhension-révisée. Les Editions du Centre de psychologie appliquée.
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
Lefavrais, P. (1967). Test de l'Alouette: test d'analyse de la lecture et de la dyslexie. Éditions du Centre de psychologie appliquée.
Lesch, M. E, & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 285-294.
Nagy, W. E., Anderson, R. C., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Learning word meanings from context during normal reading. American educational research journal, 24(2), 237-270.
Neale, M.D. (1989). Neale analysis of reading ability: Revised British edition. Windsor, UK: NFER.
Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 1-17.
Panteliadou, S., & Antoniou, F. (2007). Test Alpha (Reading test). ΕΠΕΑΕΚ, ΥΠΕΠΘ.(Standardised test for reading disabilities in Greek).
Panteliadou, S., Antoniou, F., and Sideridis, G. (2018). Διερεύνηση αναγνωστικών δεξιοτήτων και αδυναμιών [Investigation of Reading Skills and Weaknesses]. Nicosia: Rocket-lexia.
Pasquier, D. (1979). Test de lecture pour le Cours Préparatoire-TLCP. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Editions Scient (ques et Psychotechniques).
Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 461-469.
Porpodas, C. D. (2012). The way Greek children are taught to read and spell in primary. Reading and Writing Disorders in Different Orthographic Systems, 52, 177. Chicago.
Protopapas, A. (2017). Learning to read Greek. In L. T. W. Verhoeven & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems (pp. 155–180). Cambridge University Press.
Protopapas, A., Simos, P. G., Sideridis, G. D., & Mouzaki, A. (2012). The components of the simple view of reading: A confirmatory factor analysis. Reading Psychology, 33(3), 217-240.
Protopapas, A., & Skaloumbakas, C. (2007). Traditional and computer-based screening and diagnosis of reading disabilities in Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(1), 15-36.
Putka, D. J., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Reliability and validity. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 9-49). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Rust, J., Golombok, S., & Trickey, G. (1992). Wechsler Objective Reading Dimensions. London: The Psychological Corporation.
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of psychology, 94(2), 143-174.
Stanovich, K. E. (2009). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of education, 189(1-2), 23-55.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading research quarterly, 360-407.
Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Feeman, D. J. (1984). Relation between early reading acquisition and word decoding with and without context: A longitudinal study of first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 668-677.

Talli, I., Stavrakaki, S., Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2015). Assessment of reading abilities in Greek: The Greek version of the French reading test Alouette. Studies for Greek Language (Μελέτες για την Ελληνική Γλώσσα), 35, 523-532. http://ins.web.auth.gr/images/MEG_PLIRI/MEG_35_523_532.pdf

Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1997). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro–Ed.
Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific studies of reading, 11(1), 3-32.
Electronic sources

Hellenic National Corpus (HNC) [http://hnc.ilsp.gr] 

Full-Text HTML

Assessing written language in Greek: Validity and reliability considerations


Ioanna Talli

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

*Corresponding author: Ioanna Talli, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Mantzaridi 3, Panorama, Thessaloniki, 55236 Greece

Email: tallijoan@yahoo.com

How to cite this paper: Talli I. (2019). Assessing written language in Greek: Validity and reliability considerations. The Educational Review, USA, 3(8), 87-95.

DOI: 10.26855/er.2019.08.001

>> No Data
Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.