magazinelogo

Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computation

ISSN Print: 2576-0645 Downloads: 163979 Total View: 1912587
Frequency: quarterly ISSN Online: 2576-0653 CODEN: JAMCEZ
Email: jamc@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jamc.2018.06.004

AHP – TOPSIS Model as a Mathematical Support in the Selection of Project from Aspect of Mobility – Case Study

Aybeyan Selimi1,*, Mimica Milošević2, Muzafer Saračević3

1PhD Candidate, International Vision University, Faculty of Informatics, Major C. Filiposki Nr.1, Gostivar, Macedonia

2Faculty of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Mitropolita Petra 8, 1100 Belgrade, Serbia

3Associate Professor, International University of Novi Pazar, Department of Computer Science, Dimitrija Tucovica bb. 36 300 Novi Pazar, Serbia

*Corresponding author: Aybeyan Selimi

Published: June 28,2018

Abstract

The multi-criteria decision support systems are used in various fields of human activities. In each alternative of the multi-criteria decision making, the problem could be represented as a set of properties or constraints. Today the modern societies demand a high degree of mobility in the process of planning and construction, therefore it is necessary to examine a large number of different criterions in the decisions. The mobility is an important feature of life and plays a significant role in people’s activities. This paper presents a model for the selection of projects of the housing complexes, which can be integrated into the urban core of the cities and in such case that encourages frequency of activities and events of employed in IT sector, while increases the quality of life in the city. The Comparison of predetermined criteria and determination of their weight has been done with AHP method, and the best alternative is selected with TOPSIS method. The aim of this study is to highlight the importance of using of the multi-criteria optimization in the moments of making complex and important decisions by taking into account the number of criteria that need to be considered in the course of construction practice.

References

[1] Awasthi A, Chauhan S. S A hybrid approach integrating Affinity Diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning, Applied Mathematical Modelling 36, 2012

[2] Buede D., Structuring Value Attributes. Interfaces 1986

[3] Chung-MinWu, Ching-Lin Hsieh, Kuei-Lun Chang, A Hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Mathematical Problems in Engineering Volume 2013

[4] Charnes, A., and Cooper, W.W. (1977), Goal Programming and Multiple Objective Optimizations, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.1

[5] Hwang C.L, Yoon K, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, a State of the Art Survey. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, No 186. New York: Springer – Verlag, 1981.

[6] Jahanshahloo G.R, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Izadikhah M, Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data, Applied Mathematics and Computation 181 (2006) 1544–1551

[7] K. M. Fowler and E. M. Rauch, Sustainable Building Rating Systems Summary, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, operated for the U.S. Department of Energy, 2006.

[8] Milošević A, Milošević M, Milošević A, Selimi A: Ahp multi-criteria method for sustainable development in construction, 4th International Conference, Contemporary Achievements in Civil Engineering 2016, Subotica.

[9] Maliki A, Owens G, Bruce D: Combining AHP and TOPSIS Approaches to Support Site Selection

[10] N. W. Alnaser, R. Flanagan, and W. E. Alnaser, Model for calculating the sustainable building index (SBI) in the kingdom of Bahrain, Energy and Buildings, vol. 40, 2008.

[11] Paksoy T, Nimet Yapici Pehlivan N. Y, Kahraman C Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS, Expert Systems with Applications 39, 2012

[12] Saaty, T. L, Kearns, P., K.: Analytical Planning, The Organization of Systems, The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. IV, RWS Publications, 1991.

[13] Saaty, T.L, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process, Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2008

[14] Saaty, T.L., (1980): Analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

[15] Samanta, B., Mukherjee, S.K., (2002): Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision – making process, Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australia,

[16] Shapira, A., and Goldenberg, M., 2005, AHP-based equipment selection model for construction projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 13112, 1263–1273.

[17] Tarek Hanafi M. Abou-El-Enien, On the Solution of a Special Type of Large-Scale Integer Linear Vector Optimization Problems with Uncertain Data through TOPSIS Approach, Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 6, 2011.

[18] Triantaphyllou, E., Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000

[19] Valério A. P. Salomon, José Arnaldo B. Montevechi, A compilation of comparisons on the AHP and other multiple criteria decision-making methods: Some cases developed in Brazil, ISAHP 2001, Berne, Switzerland, 2001

[20] Мariola Książek, Paweł Nowak, Jerzy Rosłon, Decision making with use of the AHP method in construction, Technical transactions Сivil engineering, 2-B/2014, 31-39

[21] Mahdi I., Al-Rasheed K., Decision Support System for Selecting the Proper Project Delivery Method using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), International Journal of Project Management, 2005

How to cite this paper

AHP – TOPSIS Model as a Mathematical Support in the Selection of Project from Aspect of Mobility – Case Study

How to cite this paper: Aybeyan Selimi, Mimica Milošević, Muzafer Saračević. (2018) AHP – TOPSIS Model as a Mathematical Support in the Selection of Project from Aspect of Mobility – Case StudyJournal of Applied Mathematics and Computation2(6), 257-265.

DOI: http://doi.org/10.26855/jamc.2018.06.004