magazinelogo

Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems

ISSN Print: 2576-0521 Downloads: 26576 Total View: 319793
Frequency: semi-annually ISSN Online: 2576-053X CODEN: JEPEEG
Email: jepes@hillpublisher.com

Volumes & Issues

Current Issue

Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jepes.2018.09.001

Shale Gas Potential in Pakistan: By comparison of Sembar formation and Barnett Shale Texas

Muhammad Asim Saeed*, Babar Shahzad, Saeed Nawaz, Muzammil Kalwar, Muhammad Junaid

Department of petroleum and gas engineering; Dawood University of engineering and technology Karachi

*Corresponding author: Muhammad Asim Saeed

Published: September 28,2018

Abstract

In the current era where industrial growth has become rapid that it provokes the current supply of energy. The conventional sources are unable to meet the demand, while new sources of energy are being discovered. One of the major impacts leaving sources is the Unconventional reservoir that has proven to be a prominent source with the modern technology available.

USA has discovered the technology to extract from Shale oil and gas unconventional reservoirs that have proven to provide prominent productions and key to the future of petroleum industry. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Shale oil and gas contributes 52% oil and 48% gas in the total production.

Pakistan has a rising economy growth and the demand for energy is rising. The most part of energy is fulfilled by the use of petroleum. As per survey (2014-2015) the supply of gas is 4BCFD and demand is 8BCFD with a gap of 4BCFD and it is expected to increase in the upcoming years. The known conventional sources of Pakistan are unable to fulfill the demand, so Pakistan should also consider the unconventional sources that it compounds. There are two major unconventional shale oil and gas bearing formations that are Sembar and Ranikot formation.

This paper discusses the major characteristics of shale gas sources in Pakistan with comparison to the already developed shale gas producing field of United State of America that is Barnett shale. The Barnett shale is one of major producers of shale gas contributing 10-12 BSCFD.

The major characteristics of shale gas that defines it to be an economic source are compared in form of polar charts with their minimum required characteristics that a shale gas producer has. The Sembar formation meets the minimum requirements as a shale gas producer and when compared to the Barnett shale it exhibits similarity. On the basis of these similarities we can assume similar productions from the Sembar as seen in Barnett Shale.

References

[1] US National Petroleum Council (NPC): “Unconventional Gas Reservoirs –Tight Gas, Coal Seams and Shales” Washington DC, Working Document of the NPC Global Oil and Gas study, Topic paper NO. 29, July 18, 2007.

[2] “Sembar Goru/Ghazij Composite Total Petroleum System, Indus and Sulaiman-Kirthar Geologic Provinces Pakistan and India” C.J. Wandrey, B.E. Law, Haider Ali Shah, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2208-C

[3] “Shale Gas: A Global resource”, Oil field Review Autumn 2011:23, NO.3

[4] “Shale Gas Potential of Lower Cretaceous Sembar Formation in Middle and Lower Indus Sub-Basins, Pakistan”, Search and Discovery Article #10392 (2012), PAPG/SPE Annual Technical Conference 2011, Islamabad, Pakistan, November 22-23, 2011.

[5] “Shale Oil and Gas: Lifeline for Pakistan” Draft report SDPI by Eng. Arshad H. Abbasi.

[6] “Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Gas Resources: India and Pakistan” September 2015 by US Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585.

[7] “Evaluation of Hydrocarbon Generation and Storage in Barnett Shale”, Dan Jarvie, Special BEG/PTTC Presentation 2004, Humble Geochemical services.

How to cite this paper

Shale Gas Potential in Pakistan: By comparison of Sembar formation and Barnett Shale Texas

How to cite this paper: Muhammad Asim Saeed, Babar Shahzad, Saeed Nawaz, Muzammil Kalwar, Muhammad Junaid. (2018) Shale Gas Potential in Pakistan: By comparison of Sembar formation and Barnett Shale Texas. Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2(2), 19-25.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jepes.2018.09.001