Khadem N, Ayatollahi H, Roodsari FV. Comparison of serum levels of tri-iodothyronine (T3), thyroxin (T4), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in preeclampsia and normal pregnancy. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2012; 10(1):47-52.
 Kazerouni F, Amirrasouli H. Performance characteristics of three automated immunoassays for thyroid hormones. Caspian J Intern Med., 2012; 3(2):400-404.
 Bowerbank SL, Carlin MG, Dean JR. A direct comparison of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with clinical routine testing immunoassay methods for the detection and quantification of thyroid hormones in blood serum. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2019; 411:2839-2853.
 Zhang JJ, Arbault S, Sojic N, et al. Electrochemiluminescence imaging for bioanalysis. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2019; 12:17.1–17.21.
 CLSI. Measurement procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline — third edition. CLSI document EP09-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2013.
 CLSI. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guidelines —second edition. CLSI document EP09-A2. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute; 2003.
 Tian H, Cheng F, Zhang JB, et al. Comparability analysis of CLSI EP9-A3 on headspace gas chromatography and dry chemical colorimetry for determination of blood alcohol content. Journal of Medical Information, 2021; 34:19.
 Lin L, Dai YH, Liu DD, et al. Comparison and bias estimation of three methods in determination of glycated hemoglobin A1c. National Medical Journal of China, 2016; 96:8.
 Zheng XE, Li J, Xia WL, et al. Methodological assessment and bias estimation of two procalcitonin analysis systems according to EP9-A2. China Medical Device Information, 2018; 13:3.
 Hu HX, Zhang XM, Wen DM, et al. Comparable study on determination of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) with different methods. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science, 2016; 34:2.
 Kitchen S, Geisen U, Kappelmayer J, et al. Evaluating the analytical performance of four new coagulation assays for the measurement of fibrinogen, D-dimer and thrombin time. Int J Lab Hem., 2018; 40:637-644.
 Shi XF, Lin Y, Zhang XZ, et al. The application of new guidelines CLSI EP9-A3 in the blood coagulation analyzer comparison. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic., 2017; 14:13.
 Kraus BL, Kraus FB. Similar but not consistent: Revisiting the pitfalls of measuring IgG subclasses with different assays. J Clin Lab Anal., 2017; 31: e22146.
 Broek I, Romijin F, Smit N, et al. Quantifying protein measurands by peptide measurements: where do errors arise? Journal of Proteome Research, 2014.
 Su HJ, Zhou CY, Yang WH. Application of CLSI EP-A3 in comparison of two blood cell analyzer detection systems. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2019; 12:7.
 Lee B, Park HD. Performance evaluation of the i-Smart 300E cartridge for point-of-care electrolyte measurement in serum and plasma. J Clin Lab Anal., 2022; 36: e24295.
 Westgard S, Petrides V, Schneider S, et al. Assessing precision, bias and sigma-metrics of 53 measurements of the alinity ci systems. Clinical Biochemistry, 2017; 09:005.
 Ihara H, Kiuchi S, Ishige T, et al. Surveillance evaluation of the standardization of assay values for serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in Japan. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 2018; 55(6):647-656.