References
Bureau, U. (2022). American Community Survey (ACS). Retrieved 4 May 2022, from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/.
Crawford, J. (2004). No Child Left Behind: Misguided approach to school accountability for English language learners. In Forum on ideas to improve the NCLB accountability provisions for students with disabilities and English Language Learners (Vol. 10). Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
Crawford, J. (2007). The decline of bilingual education: How to reverse a troubling trend? International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(1), 33–37.
Evans, B., & Hornberger, N. (2005). No Child Left Behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language education policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4, 87–106.
Galloway, N., & Numajiri, T. (2020). Global Englishes language teaching: Bottom‐up curriculum implementation. TESOL Quarterly, 54(1), 118-145.
Gándara, P., & Baca, G. (2008). NCLB and California’s English language learners: The perfect storm. Language Policy, 7(3), 201-216.
Hayes, W. (2008). No child left behind: Past, present, and future. R&L Education.
Heubert, J., & Hauser, R. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Kopriva, R. (2000). Ensuring accuracy in testing for English language learners. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State Officers.
Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, T. (2012). English as a lingua franca: The challenge for language testing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(1), 199-202.
Menken, K. (2006). Teaching to the test: How No Child Left Behind impacts language policy, curriculum, and instruction for English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 30(2), 521-546.
Menken, K. (2009). No Child Left Behind and its effects on language policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 103-117.
National Security Education Program. (2002). National briefing on language and national security. Retrieved June 1, 2007, from http://www.nflc.org/policy_and_strategy/language_and_national_security/nflc_briefing_january_2002/full_transcript.
Rose, H., & Galloway, N. (2019). Global Englishes for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Scarino, A. (2014). Situating the challenges in current languages education policy in Australia–unlearning monolingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 11(3), 289-306.
Seargeant, P. (2009). The Idea of English in Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, P. 26.
Solórzano, R. (2008, June). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329.
Teng, F. (2015). The effectiveness of extensive reading on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning: Incidental versus intentional learning. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 6(1), 66-80.
U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml.(Accessed: 2nd September 2022).
Wiley, T.G. (2015). Sociolinguistics and Language Education. In Wright, Boun & García (eds.). The Handbook of Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 164-184.
Woodson, K. (2010). Discursive relationships between dominant US language policy ideologies and the Congressional Record in relation to Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The University of Texas at San Antonio.
Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Reviews 23.
Wright, W. E. (2007). Heritage language programs in the era of English-only and No Child Left Behind. Heritage Language Journal, 5(1), 1-26.