The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Print: 2575-7938 Downloads: 196132 Total View: 2852186
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2575-7946 CODEN: TERUBB

Comparative Analysis of Contents on the Pythagorean Theorem in Mathematics Textbooks from America and China

Shi Chen

Department of Mathematics Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA.

*Corresponding author: Shi Chen

Published: March 1,2024


Recent studies have demonstrated that textbook analysis is an essential method of review in mathematics education. This study conducted a comparative analysis of textbooks from America and China to evaluate how students are expected to learn information pertaining to the Pythagorean theorem. This was accomplished using the 5D model approach, specifically focusing on contents, mathematical activities, complexity levels, answering forms, and contextual features. The results showed that Chinese textbooks were slightly more complex, focused on proving the Pythagorean theorem, and presented students with real-life problems. In contrast, American textbooks were mainly concentrated on basic mathematics concepts. These findings suggest that American students should solve more items that require deep thinking, while Chinese students should improve their communication skills by practicing open-ended questions. Future studies can add to the literature by investigating other mathematics materials across a greater number of countries, thus contributing to a more globalized conversation on relevant education methods.


Agarwal, R. P. (2020). Pythagorean theorem before and after Pythagoras. Adv. Stud. Contemporary Mathematics, 30, (357-389).

Baki, A., Çatlıoğlu, H., Coştu, S., & Birgin, O. (2009). Conceptions of high school students about mathematical connections to the real-life. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1402-1407.

Basyal, D., Jones, D. L., & Thapa, M. (2022). Cognitive demand of mathematics tasks in Nepali middle school mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

Chi, N. P. (2022). A comparative study of the probability and statistics curricula in the high school mathematics textbooks of Vietnam and Germany. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(2), 69-83.

Chiotis, E. D. (2021). Pythagoras’ mathematics in architecture and his influence on great cultural works. Scientific Culture. University of the Aegean, 7(1), 57-77.

Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: Towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM, 45(5), 765-777.

Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75.

Fan, L., Turnau, S., Dole, S., Gelfman, E., Li, Y., Fan, L., Turnau, S., Dole, S., Gelfman, E., Li, Y., & Niss, M. (2004). Eprints, Retrieved from, Retrieved from Roskilde University, p. DG14: focus on the devel-opment and research of mathematics textbooks (M. Niss, Ed.).

Foxman, D. (1999). Mathematics textbooks across the world. Some evidence from the third international mathematics and science study. Berkshire: NFER. National Foundation of Educational Research.

Glasnovic Gracin, D. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: A five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003-1024.

Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An Investigation of Mathematics Textbooks and their Use in English, French and German Classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567-590.

He, K. (2022). Chinese-Style flipped classroom: Implementation and relevant cases. In Innovative education informatization with Chinese characteristics, (pp. 385-457).

Howson, G., & Hoemeke, D. (1996). Review of mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of Grade 8 texts. Mathematics Teacher, 89(3), 258-258, Retrieved from

Huang, R. (2005). Verification or proof: Justification of Pythagoras’ theorem in Chinese mathematics classrooms, Retrieved from In ERIC (Vol. 3). International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Hugener, I., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2009). Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 66–78.

Ismail, F. N., & Rosli, R. (2022). Mathematics education textbook research trends: A systematics literature review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society.

Kalanov, T. Z. (2014). Critical analysis of the mathematical formalism of theoretical physics. II. Pythagorean theorem. Citeseer.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., Findell, B., Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, & Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Larson, R., & Boswell, L. (2019). Geometry: A common Core curriculum. Big Ideas Math, Retrieved from

Li, H. (2019). A comparative study on teaching design of Pythagorean theorem in junior high school. China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Retrieved from

Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(2), 234.

Lipowsky, F., Rakoczy, K., Pauli, C., Drollinger-Vetter, B., Klieme, E., & Reusser, K. (2009). Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students’ understanding of the Pythagorean theorem. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 527-537.

Lo, J.-J., Zhou, L., & Liu, J. (2021, October) (1968). The Pythagorean Proposition. The introduction and development of triangle congruency in Chinese and US textbooks. Proceedings of the Forty-Third Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Loomis, Classics in Mathematics Education Series, Retrieved from Euroscience. Educational Resources Information Center.

Moutsios-Rentzos, A., Spyrou, P., & Peteinara, A. (2014). The objectification of the right-angled triangle in the teaching of the Pythagorean theorem: An empirical investigation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(1), 29-51.

OCED. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy, Retrieved from OCED Publishing, (pp. 25-38).

Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2013). Investigating textbooks as crucial interfaces between culture, policy and teacher curricular practice: Two contrasted case studies in France and Norway. ZDM, 45(5), 685-698.

Posamentier, A. S. (2010). The Pythagorean theorem: The story of its power and beauty, Retrieved from In Google Books. Prometheus Books.

Qin, C., Li, M., & Yan, Z. (2020). Evolution and thinking of PISA mathematical evaluation framework. China academic journal electronic publishing house.

Rahimah, D., & Visnovska, J. (2021). Analysis of mathematics textbook use: An argument for combining horizontal, vertical, and con-textual analyses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731(1), 012048.

Ratner, B. (2009). Pythagoras: Everyone knows his famous theorem, but not who discovered it 1000 years before him. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(3), 229-242.

Sammons, L. (2018). Teaching students to communicate mathematically. Ascd.

Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research, (pp. 435-454). SAGE.

Toprak, Z., & Özmantar, M. F. (2022). A comparative study of fifth-grade mathematics textbooks used in Turkey and Singapore. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(3), 106-128, Retrieved from

Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of comparative studies on Chinese and US students’ mathematics performance: Implications for mathematics education reform and research. Educational Research Review, 4(3), 177-195.

Wang, Y., Barmby, P., & Bolden, D. (2017). Understanding linear function: A comparison of selected textbooks from England and Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 131-153.

Wardana, M. W., & Kadah, L. (2021). The Feasibility Analysis of Mathematics Textbook Material based on Bell’s Criteria. Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society, 3(1), 1-24.

Wittmann, E. C. (2020). Designing teaching: The Pythagorean theorem. Connecting Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 95-160.

Yang, Y. (2009). How a Chinese teacher improved classroom teaching in Teaching Research Group: A case study on Pythagoras theorem teaching in Shanghai. ZDM, 41(3), 279-296.

Zazkis, D., & Zazkis, R. (2016). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of proof comprehension: Revisiting a proof of the Pythagorean theorem. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 777-803.

How to cite this paper

Comparative Analysis of Contents on the Pythagorean Theorem in Mathematics Textbooks from America and China

How to cite this paper: Shi Chen. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Contents on the Pythagorean Theorem in Mathematics Textbooks from America and China.The Educational Review, USA8(1), 20-26.