Qian Wang
City Culture and Communication College, Suzhou City University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
*Corresponding author: Qian Wang
Abstract
Herman Melville, renowned for his literary prowess in the 19th century, showcased a unique sensitivity to politics in his works. Among his notable creations, Bartleby, the Scrivener, published in 1853, stands as a pivotal work that delves into societal power dynamics and individual agency. Positioned as Melville’s first major work following his iconic masterpiece, Moby-Dick, it has garnered acclaim both in literary circles and on the stage. While scholars have extensively analyzed the novel from various angles, including Marxian alienation theory and existentialist perspectives, few have explored its themes of discipline and resistance through the lens of Foucault’s power theory. This paper aims to fill this gap by employing Foucault’s approach to investigate the construction of power, discipline, and resistance in Bartleby, the Scrivener. By examining the protagonist’s tragic fate, the paper aims to uncover the internal mechanisms that contribute to his plight and proposes strategies for challenging passive submission within power structures. Through this analysis, the paper not only provides a new interpretation of Melville's work but also encourages reflection on disciplinary power mecha-nisms prevalent in contemporary society.
Keywords
Melville, Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street, Michel Foucault, Discipline, Resistance
References
Bryan, L. (2018). Obligation without rule: Bartleby, Agamben, and the second-person standpoint. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 2, 169-181.
Federico, B. (2017). Charity, melancholy, and the protestant ethic in Herman Melville’s Bartleby. L’Analisi linguistica e letteraria, 1, 41-45.
Laura, K. (2019). “Something within the silent black man answered no!”; or, Is Bartleby uncle Tom on Wall Street? ESQ: A Journal of Nineteenth-Century American Literature and Culture, 4, 562-601.
Leedice, K. (1961). Dangling constructions in Melville’s ‘Bartleby’. American Speech, 3, 195.
Massimo, V. (2018). “Bartleby the Scrivener”: an allegory of reading. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée, 3, 438-448.
Melville, H. (1986). Billy Budd, Bartleby, and Other Stories. Penguin.
Ring, A. (2021). The politics of ‘primary rejection’ in Herman Melville’s Bartleby and Hitosteyer’s how not to be seen: racism, (il)legibility, surveillance, and determinate negation. German Life and Letters, 1, 67-89.
Yoshiaki, F. (2017). Bartleby’s closed desk: reading Melville against affect. Journal of American Studies, 2, 353-371.
How to cite this paper
Discipline and Resistance—A Foucauldian Approach to Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street
How to cite this paper: Qian Wang. (2024) Discipline and Resistance—A Foucauldian Approach to Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(4), 830-834.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.04.002