Yijia Xu
Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang, China.
*Corresponding author: Yijia Xu
Abstract
Compared with the traditional evaluation, the value-added evaluation is problem-oriented and enables the optimization and development of the core quality with its innovative connotation. Paying attention to the progress of students on the original basis gradually builds their key abilities such as moral cultivation and a sense of responsibility, which is a practice to implement the goal of cultivating people by virtue to everyone. In this paper, the shortcomings of traditional evaluation in reality and the advantages of value-added evaluation are analyzed to optimize its development. The abstract nature of the overall goal of traditional evaluation, the solidification of the concept over many years cause its slow development, and the utilitarian and single nature of the evaluation content and method makes it ignore the significance of the evaluation object. Value-added evaluation makes up for the shortcomings of traditional evaluation by subjectifying the evaluation object, long-term evaluation effect, extended evaluation process, and differentiated evaluation means, and revives the original purpose of promoting education through evaluation.
References
Amrein-Beardsley A. Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system [J]. Educational Researcher, 2008, 37(2): 65-75.
Aubery F, Sahn D E. Cognitive achievement production in Madagascar: a value-added model approach [J]. Education Economics, 2021, 29(6): 670-699.
Boon Sasa, Sun Gangcheng. Value-added evaluation: Promoting the sustainable development of every student [J]. Shanghai Education and Research, 2022, (03):70-75.
Cui Yunrong, Wang Shaofei. Key Words of New Curriculum [M]. Beijing: Education Science Press, 2023.
Liu Chunyan. The development dilemma and solution strategy of students' value-added Evaluation from the perspective of simultaneous five education in the new era [J]. Reference for Middle School Teaching, 2023, (15):85-87.
Newhart D W. To Learn More about Learning: The Value-Added Role of Qualitative Approaches to Assessment [J]. Research & Practice in Assessment, 2015, 10: 5-11.
Song Jiayi, Cheng Ling. Advantages and Implementation Strategies of Value-added Evaluation in Classroom Teaching [J]. Educational Science Forum, 2023, (28):26-30.
Yang Kaicheng, Fairness. On Why STEM Education is Special [J]. China Distance Education, 2022, (04): 48-54.
How to cite this paper
Analyzing the Optimization Path of Value-added Evaluation Empowering Ideological and Political Courses
How to cite this paper: Yijia Xu. (2024). Analyzing the Optimization Path of Value-added Evaluation Empowering Ideological and Political Courses.The Educational Review, USA, 8(4), 561-565.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.04.012