magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 Downloads: 524288 Total View: 5313856
Frequency: monthly ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.04.016

Critically Reviewing the Keeping Learning on Track Programme

Jiao Lu

Department of ESL, Primary School of Beijing Royal Experimental School, Beijing, China.

*Corresponding author: Jiao Lu

Published: May 20,2024

Abstract

Researchers in the field of education are convinced of the advantages of formative assessment, which is considered an effective approach to enhance students' achievement in modern education. However, some experts still argue about the validity and reliability of it. The purpose of this essay is to analyze the rationale behind the Keeping Learning on Track program, its definition, content, and how teachers implement its logical model. This report will aim to assess the validity and reliability of the data, examine its impact on teachers' classroom practices, students' educational engagement, and final achievement, critically analyze it and provide suggestions for future improvement and formative assessment. The result and conclusion indicate that there is still no evidence supporting the positive impact of the KLT program on student achievement. Therefore, additional empirical evidence is needed to advance the program and formative assessment.

References

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25. 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74. 

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 1-13.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing a theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment. Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. 

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2002). Working inside the black box: assessment for learning in the classroom. London: King’s College London Department of Education and Professional Studies.

Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2019). A critical review of research on formative assessments: the limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation: Vol. 14, Article 7.

ETS (Educational Testing Service). 2010. About the KLT program. Princeton, NJ: Author. 

http://www.ets.org/Media/Campaign/12652/about.html (accessed December 17, 2010). 

Harrison, C. (2005). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Mapping teacher change. Teacher Development, 9(2), 255-263. 

Heritage, H., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J.L. (2009). From evidence to action: A seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24-31. 

Heritage, M. (2022). Formative Assessment: Making it Happen in the Classroom. Corwin Press. 

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback and interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284. 

Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19-24. 

Lee, C., & Wiliam. D. (2006). Studying changes in the practice of two teachers developing assessment for learning. Teacher Development, 9(2), 265-283.

Leusner, D. M., Ellsworth, J., & Goe, L. (2008). Scaling up across diverse contexts: Lessons learned from five implementations of the Keeping Learning on Track programme. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association and the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9, e3292. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3292.

Nolen, S.B. (2011). The role of educational systems in the link between formative assessment and motivation. Theory into Practice, 50, 319-326. 

Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstructing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Vanderbilt University. 

Schildkampa, K., Fabienne M. van der Kleij, Maaike C. H., Wilma B. K., Bernard P. V. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 1-16.

Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment Crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765. 

Supovitz. J. A., & Klein, V. (2003). Mapping a course for improved student learning: how innovative schools systematically use student performance data to guide improvement. Consortium for policy research in education research report. 

Thum, Y. M., Tarasawa, B., Hegedus, A., Yun, X., & Bowe, B. (2015). Keeping learning on track: A case-study of formative assessment practice and its impact on learning in Meridian school district. Northwest Evaluation Association, 1-80. 

Wiliam, D. (2004a). Assessment and regulation of learning. Proceedings from the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Diego, CA.

Wiliam, D. (2004b). Keeping learning on track: integrating assessment with instruction. Proceedings from the 30th annual conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment (IAEA), Philadelphia, PA. 

Wiliam, D. (2006). Formative assessment: Getting the focus right. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 283-289. 

Retrieved from http://www.informaworld.com/10.1207/s15326977ea1103&47.

Wiliam, D. (2008). Changing classroom practice. Educational Leadership, 67(4), 36-42.

Wylie, E. C. (Eds.). (2008). Tight but loose: Scaling up teacher professional development in diverse contexts. ETS Research Report. 

Yan, Z., Li, Z.Q., Panadero, E., Yang, M., Yang L., & Lao, H. L. (2021). A systematic review on factors influencing teachers’ intentions and implementations regarding formative assessment. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy & Practice: Volume 28, 228-260.

Yin Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M…Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335-359.

How to cite this paper

Critically Reviewing the Keeping Learning on Track Programme

How to cite this paper: Jiao Lu. (2024). Critically Reviewing the Keeping Learning on Track Programme.The Educational Review, USA8(4), 580-586.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.04.016