Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com

Hill Publishing Group

Location:Home / Journals / International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research /

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijcemr.2020.07.011

Science Versus Public Sentiment: “Covid-19 is not a Bioweapon Created in a Laboratory, Say UK Scientists”, “Nope, Don’t Believe It”, Say UK Public.

Date: July 24,2020 |Hits: 2643 Download PDF How to cite this paper

John Paull

University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

*Corresponding author: John Paull

Abstract

In the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic, an unresolved question is the aetiology of Covid-19: Where did this novel coronavirus come from? When an account by “UK scientists” ruled out Covid-19 as a bioweapon and as a laboratory creation, the dismissal of the claims by the ‘vox pop’ was swift and decisive, considered and multifactorial. There was a consensus of public sentiment (of 100%) to reject the two scientific propositions of “no bioweapon” and “no laboratory involvement”. The present paper reports on the top 100 comments (ranked by reader votes and accounting for 13,983 votes, comprising 13,156 up-arrow votes and 827 down-arrow votes) of UK newspaper readers to the dismissal of Covid-19 as a bioweapon and as a laboratory construct. Com-mentators pointed out the coincidences surrounding the outbreak, especially that the reported ground-zero city of the outbreak, Wuhan, China, was also host to several coronavirus research laboratories. Commentators expressed their skepticism of governments, institutions, and also scientists to tell them the truth (even if those entities knew it). Commentators dismissed the language of the scientists, pointing out (quite rightly) that “improbable” does not equal “impossible”. Commentators proposed variously that Covid-19 escaped from a laboratory, was “Made in China”, and was a bioweapon. Some readers called for banning the eating of wild animals in China and thereby excluding that channel as a potential viral source in the future. The proximal origin of Covid-19 is presently an unsettled question. Scientists’ dismissal of the hypo-thesis that Covid-19 is a bioweapon or a laboratory construct is itself dismissed by the public. The public want answers but they are also quite ready to question and reject the accounts of scientists. In the meantime, the aetiology of Covid-19 can be expected to remain contested and unsettled for some considerable time.

References

[1] Milliken, D. (2020). UPDATE 1-UK to set out future of costly coronavirus furlough scheme on Tuesday. Reuters, 2020. 12 May (www.reuters.com).

[2] Briggs, H. (2020). Coronavirus: The race to find the source in wildlife. BBC News, 2020. 25 February (www.bbc.com).

[3] Woodward, A. (2020). Both the new coronavirus and SARS outbreaks likely started in Chinese wet markets. Photos show what the markets look like. Business Insider Australia, 2020. 23 January (www.businessinsider.com.au).

[4] Rincon, P. (2020). Coronavirus: Is there any evidence for lab release theory? BBC News, 2020. 1 May (www.bbc.com).

[5] Chan, V. S. W. (2006). Use of Genetically Modified Viruses and Genetically Engineered Virus-Vector Vaccines: Environmental Effects. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 69(21): 1971-77.

[6] Bertrand, N., D. Lippman, and L. Seligma. (2020). Officials probe the threat of a coronavirus bioweapon. Politico, 2020. 23 April (www.politico.com).

[7] Barry, J. M. (2018). The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History. 2018, (Updated edition). New York, NY: Penguin Books.

[8] Brown, J. (2018). Influenza: The Hundred-year Hunt to Cure the Deadliest Disease in History. 2018, New York, NY: Touch-stone.

[9] May, L. (2020). Covid-19 is NOT a bioweapon created in a laboratory, say UK scientists as wild theories sweep the internet. Daily Mail, 2020. 19 March.

[10] Andersen, K. G., et al. (2020). The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med, 2020. 26: p. 450–452. < https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9 >.

[11] Daily Mail. (2020). DAILY MAIL COMMENT: The failure to protect our valiant NHS staff is a tragedy. But now we can ALL do our bit. Daily Mail, 2020. 29 April.

[12] Daily Mail. (2020). House Rules. Daily Mail, 2020. <www.dailymail.co.uk/home/house_rules.html>.

[13] Xiao, B. and L. Xiao. (2020). The possible origins of 2019-nCoV caronavirus. February. preprint,: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21799.29601, 2020.

[14] Mosley, M. (2016). Inside Britain’s secret weapons research facility. BBC News, 2016. 28 June.

[15] Department of Justice. (2020). Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases. 2020, Press Release #20-99, 28 January. Washington, DC: The United States Department of Justice.

[16] Keane, D. (2020). Julian Assange secret recordings a potential “lifeline”, barrister Geoffrey Robertson says. ABC News, 2020. 24 February. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-24/geoffrey-robertson-responds-to-julian-assange-secret-recording/ 11993792.

[17] Surowiecki, J. (2004). The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. 2004, New York: Doubleday.

[18] Blagden, D. (2019). Do Democracies Possess the Wisdom of Crowds? Decision Group Size, Regime Type, and Strategic Ef-fectiveness. International Studies Quarterly, 2019. 63(4): 1192-1195.

[19] Rees, A. (2017). The stupidity of crowds. Open for Ideas, 2017(12 April): p. openforideas.org.

[20] Murray, D. (2019). The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity. 2019, London: Bloomsbury Continuum.

[21] King, A. A. (2018). Think Critically About the Wisdom of Experts. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2018. 26 November (Winter).

[22] Wilde, O. (1899). The Importance of Being Earnest, A Trivial Comedy for Serious People. 1899, London: Chiswick Press.

[23] Conan Doyle, A. (1890). The SIgn of Four. 1890, London: Spencer Blackett.

[24] Shermer, M. (2009). What Skepticism Reveals about Science: A skeptic’s journey for truth in science. Scientific American, 2009. 1 July (www.scientificamerican.com).

How to cite this paper

Science Versus Public Sentiment: “Covid-19 is not a Bioweapon Created in a Laboratory, Say UK Scientists”, “Nope, Don’t Believe It”, Say UK Public

How to cite this paper: John Paull. (2020) Science Versus Public Sentiment: “Covid-19 is not a Bioweapon Created in a Laboratory, Say UK Scientists”, “Nope, Don’t Believe It”, Say UK Public. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research, 4(3), 93-100.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijcemr.2020.07.011

Volumes & Issues

Free HPG Newsletters

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from Hill Publishing Group.

Contact us

Hill Publishing Group

8825 53rd Ave

Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA

E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.