magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 Downloads: 1007813 Total View: 8954118
Frequency: monthly ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.07.001

Psychophysical Counseling—A Tool Revealing the Individual Ability to Learn

Nikolay Petrov Takuchev

Trakia University, Stara Zagora 6000, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

*Corresponding author: Nikolay Petrov Takuchev

Published: July 26,2024

Abstract

Not all students are dealing equally successfully with educational tasks. One of the reasons is the student's lack of understanding of his/her memorial qualities in learning new knowledge. A metacognitive method is designed for psychological counseling, based on an experimental (“psycho-physical”) study of memory (Ebbinghaus). The method aims at revealing individual memory features on learning new theoretical information—the pace of memorizing and forgetting and as a result recommends a preparation time that the student should spend to achieve a desired level of preparation in the subject to be studied. Based on the data from the Ebbinghaus memory experiments, mathematical dependencies of the processes of memorization and forgetting were obtained. It was assumed that the mathematical form of the mentioned dependencies has a universal character for people. The individual specificity of these processes is reflected in the values of the parameters in the mathematical models. The models were included in the mathematical scheme of the psychophysical counseling method described. The application of the method requires the student to undergo a consultation procedure of three stages: (1) An experiment to memorize a short-written text on a topic from the subject to be studied; (2) Immediately af-ter solving a computer test of the multiple-choice type for quantitative assessment of the degree of memorization of the material of the test topic. The method uses the obtained estimate to calculate the individual parameter values in the memorization model; (3) The same computer test is repeated a week later (the student is not warned about this) to quantify the degree of forgetting. The method uses the estimate from the second test to calculate the individual parameter values in the forgetting model. Through the obtained values of the individual parameters for memorizing and forgetting, for the student's desired level of assimilation of the material to be studied, the counseling method calculates the necessary time that the student must devote to his preparation.

Keywords

Education; Ebbinghaus; Psychophysical counseling; Memorization pace; Forgetting pace

References

Baker-Ward L., Ornstein P. A., & Holden D. J. (1984). The expression of memorization in early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 555-575. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(84)90076-6.

Bulgarian norms for reading technique. http://bglog.net/nachobrazovanie/36291, Last visit: 1/25/2016. (In Bulgarian)

Ebbinghaus H. (1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. http://psy.ed.asu.edu/~classics/Ebbinghaus/index.htm Last visited: 1/25/2016.

Ehrlich M-F. (1982). An Experimental Study of the Relationship Between Comprehension and Memorization of a Text. Advances in Psychology, Volume 9, Pages 157-168. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(09)60049-2.

Hamidi F., Kharamideh Z. M., & Ghorbandordinejad F. (2011). Comparison of the Training Effects of Interactive Multimedia (CDs) and Non-Interactive Media (films) on Increasing Learning Speed, Accuracy and Memorization in Biological Science Course. Proceedings Computer Science, 3 (2011), 144-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.025.

Kruger J. & Dunning D. (1999). Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (6). DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121. pp. 1121-34.

Mastroianni F., Panza F., Solfrizzi V., Nardó G.A., Torres F., Resta F., & Capurso A. (1996). Analysis of some aspects of learning and memorization processes in an adult population. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Volume 22, Supplement 1, Pages 29-34.

Schraw G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, Volume 26, Issue 1-2, pp 113-125.

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677.

Takuchev N. P. (2023a) Assessment of knowledge through assessment of ignorance: Semantic approach in information theory, information value (importance), assessment of knowledge through tests of the multiple choice type. AIP Conf. Proc., 2889, 090007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173007.

Takuchev N. P. (2023b). Assessment of knowledge by assessing ignorance: An adaptive algorithm for assessing knowledge through tests of the multiple-choice type. AIP Conf. Proc. 2889, 090007. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0173006.

Takuchev NP. (2023c). Semantic approach of knowledge assessment through tests of multiple choice type–theory, confirming experiment, and an adaptive algorithm. J Pure Appl Math., 2023; 7(4):260-271. DOI: 10.37532/2752-8081.23.7(4).260-271.

Trifu S., Trifu A., & Trifu I. (2016). Psychic functions and processes with princeps role in learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217 (2016), 421-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.003.

Yoshida K., Hirai F., & Miyaji I. (2014). Learning system using simple electroencephalograph feedback effect during memory work. Proceedings Computer Science, 35 1596-1604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.243.

How to cite this paper

Psychophysical Counseling—A Tool Revealing the Individual Ability to Learn

How to cite this paper: Nikolay Petrov Takuchev. (2024). Psychophysical Counseling—A Tool Revealing the Individual Ability to Learn.The Educational Review, USA8(7), 896-907.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.07.001