Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.07.024
Is the Doctrine of the Mean Really “Too Much Is Too Little”?
Yichun Yin
School of Marxism, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321017, Zhejiang, China.
*Corresponding author: Yichun Yin
Published: August 13,2024
Abstract
The Doctrine of the Mean, as the core of Confucianism, has a profound cultural heritage and extensive social influence and is an important thought in Chinese philosophy. In ancient times, the doctrine of the mean was widely applied in all aspects of social life, running through various periods of Chinese social history and becoming an important force in promoting social progress and stability. It is generally believed that the Doctrine of the Mean emphasizes the "appropriate method of handling things", that is, to avoid the extreme between excess and deficiency, and to seek a balance point, which is called "too much is too little", and to use the "middle" as a means. However, in reality, the doctrine of the mean goes beyond that. A comprehensive understanding of the Doctrine of the Mean requires both moral and philosophical approaches. In addition to the philosophical concepts of "too much is too little", "stubbornness is too much", and "contingency is too much", the Doctrine of the Mean also includes the unity of "benevolence" and "propriety", as well as moral cultivation aspects such as "prudence and independence", "loyalty and forgiveness", "utmost sincerity", and "neutrality". With the changes of the times, the status and significance of the Doctrine of the Mean in modern society have also changed, and there has been a deviation in the understanding of the Doctrine of the Mean, forming incorrect understandings. However, in today's society, the doctrine of the mean still holds significant importance. This article will explore the concept and historical evolution, theoretical connotation, and practical value of the Doctrine of the Mean, and combine it with the actual situation of modern society to analyse the inspiration of the Doctrine of the Mean to contemporary society.
References
Chen Shudong. Interpreting the Doctrine of the Mean through the Doctrine of the Mean. International Comparative Literature (Chinese and English), 2019, 2(03): 442-458. DOI: 10.19857/j.cnki. icl. 2019.03.003.
Dai Mengsi, Li Baoyan. Research on the Core Essence and Contemporary Inspiration of Confucianism's "Doctrine of the Mean" [J]. Journal of Fujian University of Education, 2019, 20(07): 45-48.
He Xiang Chao. Research on the Doctrine of the Mean [D]. Yunnan Normal University, 2015.
Mi Jijun. A Study on the Doctrine of the Mean in Pre Qin Confucianism [D]. Northeast Normal University, 2005.
Su Xin. An Analysis of the Doctrine of the Mean of Confucius, Mencius, and Xun in Confucianism [J]. Modern and An-cient Cultural and Creative, 2022 (41): 61-63. DOI: 10.20024/j.cnki CN42-1911/I.2022.41.018.
Wang Zhijuan. Wang Yangming's Doctrine of the Mean [D]. Suzhou University, 2008.
Zhang Xinglan, Wang Lei, Chen Jinhua. Co reading "The Doctrine of the Mean" in the Analects of Confucius. The "Su-preme Virtue" in Confucius' Mind. Teenage, 2023 (Z3): 31-35.
Zhu Hanmin. Zhu Xi's Interpretation and Construction of the Doctrine of the Mean [J]. Tsinghua Guoxue, 2022 (01): 3-15.
How to cite this paper
Is the Doctrine of the Mean Really "Too Much Is Too Little"?
How to cite this paper: Yichun Yin. (2024) Is the Doctrine of the Mean Really "Too Much Is Too Little"? Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 8(7), 1680-1683.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2024.07.024