Abstract
The growing demand for rapid manufacturing has positioned standardized building materials as the dominant choice in contemporary construction. However, the potential of sub-natural materials, such as earth and tree branches, remains underexplored. This paper investigates the historical evolution of sub-natural materials in construction, analyzing the factors contributing to their resurgence in modern manufacturing and their relevance to sustainable practices. This study highlights how sub-natural materials interact with digitization and sustainable production methods by examining projects that incorporate these redundant materials, such as earth-based constructions. The research emphasizes the environmental and cultural significance of returning to these materials, which offer advantages in adaptability, ecological balance, and resource efficiency. The study also discusses how integrating digital tools can enhance the precision and scalability of using sub-natural materials, promoting their broader application in modern architectural contexts. Ultimately, this paper sheds light on the emerging potential of sub-natural materials as viable, sustainable alternatives in contemporary construction.
References
[1] Assefa G, et al. Environmental assessment of building properties—Where natural and social sciences meet: The case of EcoEffect. Building and Environment. 2007;42(3):1458-1464.
[2] Gissen D. Subnature: architecture's other environments. Princeton Architectural Press; 2009.
[3] Niroumand H, et al. Earth architecture from ancient until today. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;89:222-225.
[4] Morel, Jean-Claude, et al. Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment. 2001;36(10):1119-1126.
[5] Kéré, Diébédo Francis. School in gando, burkina faso. Architectural Design. 2012;82(6):66-71.
[6] Ibañez, Daniel, Jane Hutton, Kiel Moe, eds. Wood urbanism: from the molecular to the territorial. Actar Publishers; 2019.
[7] Vercruysse E, Kate D, Wyatt A. Foraging for a Field Station. Fabricate. 2024(April 4, 2024);14-21.
[8] Gomaa M, et al. 3D printing system for earth-based construction: Case study of cob. Automation in Construction. 2021;124: 103577.
[9] Morel, Jean-Claude, et al. Building houses with local materials: means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment. 2001;36(10):1119-1126.
[10] Scheurer, Fabian. Digital craftsmanship: from thinking to modeling to building. Digital workflows in architecture. 2012;76.
[11] Tim C, et al. Wild Wood Gridshells: Mixed-Reality Construction of Nonstandard Wood. Technology|Architecture + Design 7. 2023 Jul 3;(2):216-31.
[12] Kaiser R, Ben B, Elise E, Jane S. BioKnit: Development of Mycelium Paste for Use with Permanent Textile Formwork. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2023 Jul 14;11.
[13] Rossi A, et al. Upscaling Mycelium-Based Composites Strategies for Biofabrication of Sustainable Building Components. Fabricate. 2024 Apr 4;130-137.
How to cite this paper
The Role of Sub-natural Materials in Building Fabrication
How to cite this paper: Yu Li. (2024). The Role of Sub-natural Materials in Building Fabrication. Engineering Advances, 4(4), 162-168.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ea.2024.10.002