magazinelogo

Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science

ISSN Print: 2576-0556 Downloads: 535657 Total View: 3963802
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2576-0548 CODEN: JHASAY
Email: jhass@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2017.01.001

The Status of Implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 in India with Special Reference to West Bengal

Atrayee Banerjee

Teaching faculty, Department of Human Rights, Basanti Devi College, Kolkata; Guest faculty in Post Graduation Degree Program in Human Rights, Department of Anthropology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata.

*Corresponding author: Atrayee Banerjee

Published: April 25,2018

Abstract

The forest dependent indigenous communities in India are dependent on forest resources for their subsistence. In the present parlance of forest management in post-colonial India, most of these traditional products of the forest have been named non-timber forest produce (NTFP). The implicit dichotomy is between what constitutes timber, which can be sold at high prices in the market and is state property, and what is not timber, of less commercial value, and to which local communities can be allowed access. The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 (or FRA) is a welcome piece of legislation to recognise the customary rights of forest dependent scheduled tribe and non-scheduled tribe communities who have been residing in such forests for generations but whose rights could not be recorded. The provisions enshrined in FRA gave special emphasis on the involvement of the traditional forest dwellers in the process of sustainable development, conservation of bio-diversity and maintenance of ecological balance since they have a vast knowledge of traditional knowledge of such practices.

References

Banerjee, A., Ghosh, S. and Bagniski, O. S. (2010). Obstructed Access to Forest Justice in West Bengal. Discussion Paper Seri es No.49. United Kingdom.

Citizens’ Report. (2015). Community Forest Rights under the Forest Rights Act. Pune, Bhubaneshwar and New Delhi: Kalpavriksh and Vasundhara in collaboration with Oxfam India.

Editorial. (2007). Forests and Tribals: Restoring Rights. Economic and Political Weekly. 42(1) (Pp. 04).

Gadgil, M., and Guha, R. (1992). This Fissured Land: An Ecological History of India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Government of West Bengal. (2013). Backward Classes Welfare Department. Kolkata.

Government of West Bengal. (2014). Backward Classes Welfare Department. Kolkata.

Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London, UK: Routledge.

Jain, A., and Sharma, R. (2015). The Indian Forest Rights Act, 2006: Salient Features, Scope and 2012 Amendment Rules. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 4(2) (Pp. 95-108).

Jha, S. (2010). Process Betrays the Spirit: Forest Rights Act in Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly. 65(33).

Jhala, G. (2007 September 23). Conflict will go Up by 10000 Percent. Daily News and Analysis. Retrieved fromhttp://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/special-conflict-will-go-up-by-10000-per-cent-1140969 on 15/09/2014.

Kalpavriksh (Environment Action Group). (2006). Comments on the Joint Committee Report o n ‘The Scheduled Tribes (Recognition of Forest Rights) Bill 2005. Retrieved from http://www.kalpavriksh.org/index.php/conservation -livelihoods1/laws-policies/forest-rights-act on 25/05/2012.

Kalpavriksh (Environment Action Group). (2007). The Scheduled Tri bes and Other Forest- Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) act

2006: Critical Amendments, Clear Rules and Assessment Period Needed. Retrieved from http://www.kalpavriksh.org/index.php/conservation-livelihoods1/laws-policies/forest-rights-act on 25/05/2012.

Kothari, A. (2008). A Long and Winding Path. Frontline (Pp. 18).

Kothari, A., and Pathak, N. (2006). Will the Forest Rights Bill Save Both Tribals and Tigers?. Retrieved from http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=123265&catID=2&category=Nation on 30/05/2014.

Ministry of Tribal Affairs(MoTA). (2013). Government of India. New Delhi.

Ministry of Tribal Affairs(MoTA). (2012). Government of India. New Delhi.

Prasad, A. (2007). Survival at stake. Frontline ( Pp. 04–10).

Shrivastava, K. S. (2014). Claims of Forest Rights Act holding up growth are bogus. Down to Eatrh. Retrieved from http://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/claims-of-forest-rights-act-holding-up-growth-are-bogus-47873 on 19/01/2015.

Special Correspondent. (2006 December 20). Tribals Feel Betrayed by Rights Law. The Hindu.

The Forest Rights Act 2006. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.forestrightsact.com/current -situation on 20/12/2014.

Upadhyay, S. (2008). Missing the Tribal for the Trees. Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/2008/02/03232126/Missing-the-tribal-for-the-tre.html on 05/08/2012.

Venkateswarlu, K. (2007). Conflicts Feared. Frontline (Pp. 31).

How to cite this paper

The Status of Implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 in India with Special Reference to West Bengal

How to cite this paper: Atrayee Banerjee. (2024) The Status of Implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006 in India with Special Reference to West Bengal. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science1(1), 1-12.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2017.01.001