magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Print: 2575-7938 Downloads: 420893 Total View: 4668327
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2575-7946 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.11.017

Cognitive and Heuristic Modeling of Reality, Developing Innovative Thinking: A Semiotic Approach to Training an Individual

Valeriy Mygal1, Galyna Mygal2,*, Stanislav Mygal3

1Department of Physics, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”, Kharkiv 61000, Ukraine.

2Department of Transport Technologies, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv 79000, Ukraine.

3Department of Design, Ukrainian National Forestry University, Lviv 79057, Ukraine.

*Corresponding author: Galyna Mygal

Published: December 13,2024

Abstract

The article is devoted to the development of ideas and methods for individualization of training based on the complementarity and interrelation of the structures of cognitive and heuristic metamodels of hybrid reality, including the human brain. Digitalization of science, education, and technology has increased the complexity of spatio-temporal relationships, the virtuality of which has created new challenges to the quality of education, mental health, and technogenic safety. Based on the evolution of ideas, paradigms, and methods for studying physical and virtual reality, the structural-functional approach to the transformation of experiential learning cycles according to D. Kolb is developing. Based on the semiotic paradigm of cognition, integrative methodology for studying complex dynamic systems, and criteria for assessing creative activity, the structural-functional approach to metamodeling of a hybrid subject environment is developing. The author's cognitive 3M-metamodel (metathinking, metacognition, and metaphor) and the author's heuristic 3S-metamodel (self-knowledge, self-regulation, and self-reflection) are presented. Interrelation and complementarity of 3M and 3S metamodels contribute to synergy, emergence, and harmony, which are aimed at the formation of an individual's metathinking in the process of learning from experience using GenAI.

References

Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1988). Self-organized criticality. Physical Review Letters, 59(4), 381-384.

DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.381.

Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovations Inspired by Nature. Harper Perennial. ISBN-13 978-0060533229.

Fedota, J. R. & Parasuraman, R. (2010). Neuroergonomics and human error. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(5), 402-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220902853104.

French, S. (2014). The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation. Oxford University Press.

Gilbert, K. J. (2007). Visualization in science education. Springer Science &Business Media, 41(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3613-2.

Gеdеl, К. (1930). Die Vollständigkeit der Axiome des logischen Funktionenkalküls. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 37, part 2.

Haken, H. (1995). Principles of Brain Functioning. A Synergetic Approach to Brain Activity, Behavior and Cognition. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79570-1.

Haken, H. (1996). Synergetics as a bridge between the natural and social sciences. Evolution, Order and Complexity. Chapter 11. London.

Illiashenko, O., Mygal, V., Mygal, G., & Protasenko, O. (2021). A convergent approach to the viability of the dynamical systems: The cognitive value of complexity. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 11(6), 713-719.

https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.110612.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2013). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory 4.0 (A Comprehensive Guide to the Theory, Psychometrics, Research on Validity and Educational Applications). Experience Based Learning Systems.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Leventhal, H. (1974). Emotions: a basic problem for social psychology. In Nemeth С. (Ed.), Social psychology: classic and contempo-rary integrations (pp. 1-51). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Leventhal, H. A (1984). Perceptual-motor theory of emotion. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 117-182). New York: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60119-7.

Mygal V. P., Mygal G. V. & Mygal S. P. (2024). AI: Unique Opportunities and Global Challenges—A Hybrid Approach to Modeling Reality and Its Perception. Jul 4, 2024. Qeios ID: https://doi.org/10.32388/GIJ3RI.4.

Mygal, G., Mygal, V., Protasenko, O., & Klymenko, I. (2022). Cognitive Aspects of Ensuring the Safety, Dependability and Stability of a Dynamic System’s Functioning in Extreme Conditions. In M. Nechyporuk et al. (Eds.), ICTM 2021, Cham: Springer, LNNS 367, pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_18.

Mygal, V.P., Mygal, G.V., & Myhal, A.V. (2023). Heuristic metamodeling - a transdisciplinary approach. J. Nano-Electron. Phys., 15(6), 06032-1 - 06032-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.15(6).06032.

Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371. DOI: 10.3390/su11164371.

Newby, G. (2001). The Strong Cognitive Stance as a Conceptual Basis for the Role of Information in Informatics and Information System Design. Cognitive space and information space. NY: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technol-ogy archive, 52(12), 1026-1048. DOI: 10.1002/asi.1172.

Nye, J. (1957). Physical properties of crystals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Parasuraman, R. (2003). Neuroergonomics: research and practice. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci., 4, 1-2, 5-20.

DOI: 10.1080/14639220210199753.

Parasuraman, R., & Mehta, R. (2013). Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front Hum Neurosci, 7, 889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00889.

Roco, M. & Bainbridge, W. (2021). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0359-8.

How to cite this paper

Cognitive and Heuristic Modeling of Reality, Developing Innovative Thinking: A Semiotic Approach to Training an Individual

How to cite this paper: Valeriy Mygal, Galyna Mygal, Stanislav Mygal. (2024). Cognitive and Heuristic Modeling of Reality, Developing Innovative Thinking: A Semiotic Approach to Training an IndividualThe Educational Review, USA8(11), 1379-1392.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.11.017