magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 Downloads: 527074 Total View: 5337790
Frequency: monthly ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.01.007

Review of Online Teacher-Student Interaction

Shiyan Qiao1,*, Hongyu Zhao2

1Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou 510800, Guangdong, China.

2Guangzhou Administration Institute, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, China.

*Corresponding author: Shiyan Qiao

Published: February 12,2025

Abstract

This paper presents a multifaceted review of online teacher-student interaction, from the perspectives of historical, empirical, and theoretical aspects. Historically, it traces the evolution of discourse analysis, with a specific focus on teachers' discourse analysis in the realm of online teaching. By examining past studies, it uncovers recent challenges such as issues in communication flow and students’ engagement in teaching activities. It also identifies literature gaps, like the lack of long-term impact studies. Empirically, it goes through all the key variables like student participation, course type, students’ interaction competence, teacher feedback styles, and so on. The dimensions of the research, such as the influence of different platforms, are also explored. A detailed table showcases the matrix and meta-analysis of relevant literature, enabling a systematic overview of the empirical findings. Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories System (FIACS), as one of the key theories used in the analysis of interaction mode, has been reviewed from the historical approach, which will lay the theoretical foundation for studies of online teacher-student interaction.

References

Akarasriworn, C., & Ku, H. Y. (2013). Graduate students’ knowledge construction and attitudes toward online synchronous video-conferencing collaborative learning environment. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 14, 35.

Alamri, A., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2017). Factors affecting learners with disabilities–instructor interaction in online learning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416681497.

Amalia, P. A., Adham, M., Maulita, & Bhakti, S. (2022). Learners’ perception towards online classroom environment during pandemic of COVID-19, TPACK in EFL context. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2021 (ICAST-SS 2021) (p. 647). Atlantis Press.

Ameiratrini, T., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Students’ perceptions of teacher talk through online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020) (p. 546). Atlantis Press.

Bonyadi, A. (2019). Discourse analysis and language pedagogy: A review. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, (21), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2019-0009.

Carliner, S. (2004). Overview of online learning. Human Resource Development Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Huang, G. (2016). The rise and development of ecolinguistics. Foreign Languages in China, 1, 1, 9-12.

Huang, G. (2017). One assumption and three principles for ecological analysis of discourse and behavior. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 6, 880-889.

Kamalu, I., & Osisanwo, A. (2015). Discourse analysis. In I. Kamalu & I. Tamunobelema (Eds.), Issues in the study of language and literature (pp. 169-195). Kraft Books Limited.

Kusuma, P. C., Pahlevi, M. R., & Saefullah, H. (2021). EFL teachers’ perception towards online classroom interaction during COVID-19 pandemic. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 12(2), 68-79.

Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i2.137.

Pitariu, L. R. (2018). Critical discourse analysis of classroom interaction. Revista Transilvania, 4.

Prasetyo, R. I., & Mulyani, M. (2018). Teacher’s directives speech acts in teaching-learning interactions: Classroom discourse analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(3).

Rahayu, R. P., & Wirza, Y. (2020). Teachers’ perception of online learning during pandemic COVID-19. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(3), 392-406.

Rosayanti, N., & Hardiana, T. (2021). The aftermaths of EFL online classroom during a year of COVID-19 pandemic: Perception and score. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), 225.

Sadeghi, S., Ketabi, S., Tavakoli, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2012). Application of critical classroom discourse analysis (CCDA) in analyzing classroom interaction. English Language Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n1p166

Sirdesai, N., Saraf, C., & Gade, S. (2022). Paradigm shift in teaching-learning from classroom to virtual mode – Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education Technology in Health Sciences, 8(3), 117-121.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. University of Chicago Press.

Susanto, D. A., Oktavia, M., & Sembiring, L. T. A. B. (2021). Students’ understanding on spoken discourse in the context of English language teaching (ELT) at university. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing Dan Sastra, 5(1).

https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v5i1.18780.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.

Sybing, R. (2021). Examining dialogic opportunities in teacher-student interaction: An ethnographic observation of the language classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100492.

Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D., & Coffin, C. (2021). Combining sociocultural discourse analysis and multimodal analysis to explore teachers’ and pupils’ meaning making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100520.

UNESCO. (2020). School closures caused by Coronavirus (COVID-19). Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationrespons.

Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015711.

Wang, M., & Louick, R. (2020). Positioning and motivation: A discourse analysis of classroom interactions between teacher and students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.18666/ldmj-2020-v25-i2-10310.

Wijaya, N. K. C., Nitiasih, P. K., & Budiarta, L. G. R. (2022). EFL teacher’s perceptions towards online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(3), 318.

Zarrinabadi, N., & Ebrahimi, A. (2019). Increasing peer collaborative dialogue using a flipped classroom strategy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3).

Zhou, Q., & Tong, Z. (2021). Trend and focus of research on classroom discourse of foreign language teachers in China: A visualized analysis based on CiteSpace software. Journal of Changchun University, 31(4), 87-89.

How to cite this paper

Review of Online Teacher-Student Interaction

How to cite this paper: Shiyan Qiao, Hongyu Zhao. (2025). Review of Online Teacher-Student Interaction. The Educational Review, USA9(1), 41-48.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.01.007