magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Online: 2575-7946 Downloads: 527065 Total View: 5337716
Frequency: monthly ISSN Print: 2575-7938 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.03.008

Theology Students’ Views on the Communication with the ‘Other’ During COVID-19 Lockdown

Vasiliki Mitropoulou*, Richard Janus, Maria Meke

Aristotle University, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece.

*Corresponding author: Vasiliki Mitropoulou

Published: April 10,2025

Abstract

During the academic year 2022-2023, the Schools of Theology at Aristotle University of Thessaloniki and Paderborn University conducted field research among 60 students about whether they believed their communication skills with the ‘others’ had improved during the lockdown due to COVID-19. The participating students belonged to three Christian denominations (Orthodox, Protestant, and Catholic) and were all pursuing degrees to become Religious Education teachers. They were asked to fill in a questionnaire, developed and used for the purposes of the study, that also encouraged them to become self-aware of their emotions while communicating with ‘others’—individuals who, like themselves, were isolated in their homes. The results indicated that students’ reflections on their communication with the ‘others’ varied, revealing different perspectives and insights. However, the prevailing emotion among students was that their communication skills did not improve during the lockdown period caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. A majority of the students—approximately 65.64%—expressed solely negative viewpoints, suggesting that digital communication cannot adequately substitute for real, face-to-face interactions, and that the absence of interpersonal contact and social engagement has resulted in diminished quality of relationships. This was followed by a smaller proportion of students who articulated only positive arguments and emotions or presented a balanced view, incorporating both positive and negative aspects. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic also had some significant positive results in the transformation of human communication, revealing both challenges and opportunities across various Christian denominations.

References

Angel, H.-F. (2011). Can the concept of creditions be applicable to Psychology of Religion? In Ways to the human beings, 63, 4-26.

Angel, H.-F. (2017). Credition: From the question of belief to the question of believing. In H.-F. Angel, L. Oviedo, R. F. Paloutzian, A. L. C. Runehov, & R. J. Seitz (Eds.), Processes of believing: The acquisition, maintenance, and change in creditions (pp. 17-36). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50924-2_2

Aubrey, K., & Riley, A. (2022). Understanding and using educational theories (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Azari, N., Nickel, J., Wunderlich, G., Niedeggen, M., Hefter, H., Tellmann, L., Herzog, H., Stoerig, P., Birnbacher, D., & Seitz, R. (2001). Neural correlates of religious experience. European Journal of Neuroscience, 13(8), 1649-1652.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01527.x

Cajendra, V., & Kanka, M. (1999). Educational research (E. Griva, Trans.). Athens, Greece: Typothito-Dardanos.

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Frevert, U. (2020). Corona feelings. In B. Kortmann & G. G. Schulze (Eds.), Beyond corona: Our world after the pandemic - perspectives from science (pp. 13-20). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.

Frey, B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Goleman, D. (2011). Emotional intelligence (A. Papastavrou, Trans.). Athens, Greece: Pedio.

Gravelmann, R. (2022). Youth in crisis: The pandemic and its effects. Weinheim, Germany/Basel, Switzerland: Beltz Juventa.

Gray, J. R., Braver, T. S., & Raichle, M. E. (2002). Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(6), 4115-4120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.062381899

Humphrey, N., Curran, A., Morris, E., Farrell, P., & Woods, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and education: A critical review. Educational Psychology, 27(2), 235-254.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410601066735

Javeau, C. (2000). Research with questionnaire: The manual of a good researcher. Athens, Greece: Typothito.

Liff, S. B. (2003). Social and emotional intelligence: Applications for developmental education. Journal of Developmental Education, 26(3), 28-32. http://tricountycc.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/social-emotional-intelligence-applications/docview/228526317/se-2

Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2014). Intergroup emotions and the social self: Prejudice reconceptualized as differentiated reactions to outgroups. In The social self (pp. 309-326). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Mitropoulou, V., Gkirlou, D., & Meke, M. (2018). Building worldviews with credition teaching model in high school curricula of religious education: A controlled experimental study. Sociology Study, 8(7), 325-335.

https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5526/2018.07.003

O'Neill, J. (1996). On emotional intelligence: A conversation with Daniel Goleman. Ipswich, MA: EBSCO Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023a). PISA 2022 results: Factsheets Greece.

https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/greece-a24e696b/

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023b). PISA 2022 results: Factsheet Germany.

https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/germany-1a2cf137#chapter-d1e11

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Renz, H. (Ed.). (2022). The corona-atlas. Berlin, Germany/Boston, MA: de Gruyter.

Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Blackwell.

Robson, C. (2010). Research in the real world (B. Ntalakou & K. Vasilikou, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Athens, Greece: Gutenberg.

Schambeck, M. (2023). What religion and theology have to offer in times of crisis - Considerations from the sociology of religion, social psychology and religious education. In M. Schambeck & W. Verburg (Eds.), How religion is suitable for crises. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Sugiura, M., Rudiger, S., & Angel, H.-F. (2015). Models and neural bases of the believing process. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science, 5, 12-23.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2015.51002

Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75.

https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063

Wagner, D. (2020). The best of both worlds - hybrid formats in science. In B. Kortmann & G. G. Schulze (Eds.), Beyond corona: Our world after the pandemic - perspectives from science (pp. 233-241). Bielefeld, Germany: transcript.

Zafeiropoulos, K. (2005). How is scientific work being written? (2nd ed.). Athens, Greece: Kritiki.

How to cite this paper

Theology Students' Views on the Communication with the 'Other' During COVID-19 Lockdown

How to cite this paper: Vasiliki Mitropoulou, Richard Janus, Maria Meke. (2025). Theology Students' Views on the Communication with the 'Other' During COVID-19 Lockdown. The Educational Review, USA9(3), 321-334.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.03.008