Abstract
In an era where global ecological concerns are of utmost importance, animal protection has emerged as a critical issue. China and Spain, each with its own unique historical, cultural, and social characteristics, have taken different routes in promoting animal protection initiatives. This thesis aims to compare the current practices of the two countries, identify the underlying factors causing the differences, and offer constructive suggestions for the development of China’s animal welfare. Through an examination of policy frameworks, legal implementations, achievements, and enforcement challenges, the study explores the disparities originating from historical contexts, public awareness levels, cultural traditions, and professional training in educational systems. The research is significant as it broadens cross-cultural comparative studies and proposes practical measures to improve China’s legal mechanisms. It encourages a change in societal attitudes towards animal welfare and sets new academic directions for implementation strategies. By promoting ethical treatment standards, this work aims to prevent animal cruelty and contribute to the preservation of ecological balance and biodiversity. Ultimately, the comparative analysis is intended to support sustainable development goals through enhanced international cooperation in animal protection. The findings can help create more animal-friendly environments and strengthen global partnerships in this vital field. This academic endeavor strives to bridge policy gaps and foster mutual understanding between Eastern and Western approaches to animal welfare challenges.
References
Cao, T., Chi, L., Li, H., Zhang, H., Wang, Y., & Hou, X. (2024). A survey of the career selection values of “Post-00s” vocational college students majoring in veterinary medicine. Shandong Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 45(10), 24-27.
González, I. F. (2021). Animals and coercive measures in the judicial process [Doctoral dissertation, Autonomous University of Barcelona]. Barcelona, Spain.
Kong, L., & Su, T. (2023). An exploration of the relationship between the consciousness of primitive totem worship in China and Chinese characters. Jin Gu Wen Chuang, (38), 62-64.
Liu, C., Cheng, S., Luo, Y., & Shi, G. (2012). Introduction and comparative analysis of the new EU Directive 2010/63/EU for the protection of laboratory animals. Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine, (05), 72-76.
Liu, X., & Wang, K. (2022). A preliminary exploration of the ethical issues of cultured meat: Meat metaphors, moral implications for animals and humans. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 38(09), 77-83.
Official State Gazette, Law 7/2023, of March 28, on the protection of the rights and welfare of animals. BOE-A-2023-7936.
Torres, Á. C. P. (2021). Respect for animals as a cross-cutting theme in values for early childhood education. Horizontes, 5, 19-32.
Vázquez, E. L. (2023). Animal welfare as the basis for environmental control for energy and productive efficiency in transition pig farms [Doctoral dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela]. Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Yang, Z., Qin, B., & Lin, Y. (2023). An interpretation of the new wildlife protection law. Environmental Protection, 51(16), 37-41.
Zeng, H. (2011). Ethical review of contemporary Chinese food culture [Master’s thesis, Hunan Normal University]. Hunan, China.