References
[1] World Health Organization. Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available from:
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252267/9789241565400-eng.pdf
[2] Bitzer J, Abalos V, Apter D, et al. Targeting factors for change: contraceptive counseling and care of female adolescents. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(6):417-30.
[3] World Health Organization. Adolescent pregnancy. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from:
https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy
[4] United Nations. Resolution XVIII. Human Rights Aspects of Family Planning, Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights. New York: UN; 1968. Doc. A/CONF. 32/41, p.15.
[5] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Family Planning 2022: meeting the changing needs for family planning. New York: UN; 2022. Report No.: UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 4. Available from:
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/files/documents/2023/Feb/undesa_pd_2022_world-family-planning.pdf
[6] Marshall C, Kandahari N, Raine-Bennett T. Exploring young women's decisional needs for contraceptive method choice: a qualitative study. Contraception. 2018;97(3):243-8.
[7] Todd N, Black A. Contraception for adolescents. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020;12(Suppl 1):28-40.
[8] Teal S, Edelman A. Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: a review. JAMA. 2021;326(24):2507-18.
[9] Nucci-Sack A, Rojas M, Alpert IL, et al. Approach to and evaluation of the adolescent female. In: Altchek ADL, editor. Pediatric, adolescent & young adult gynecology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p.134-40.
[10] World Health Organization. Adolescent Sexual Reproductive Health. Geneva: WHO; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/activities/adolescent-sexual-reproductive-health
[11] Durante JC, Sims J, Jarin J, et al. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents: a review of practices to support better communication, counseling, and adherence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2023;14:97-114.
[12] Stacey D, Hill S, McCaffery K, et al. Shared decision-making interventions: theoretical and empirical evidence with implications for health literacy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:263-83.
[13] Stacey D, Légaré F, Boland L, et al. 20th anniversary Ottawa decision support framework: part 3 overview of systematic reviews and updated framework. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(3):379-98.
[14] D'Souza P, Bailey JV, Stephenson J, Oliver S. Factors influencing contraception choice and use globally: a synthesis of systematic reviews. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2022;27(5):364-72.
[15] D'Souza P, Phagdol T, D'Souza SRB, et al. Interventions to support contraceptive choice and use: a global systematic map of systematic reviews. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2023;28(2):83-91.
[16] Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey CHC, et al. Chapter 10: Umbrella Reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020. Available from:
https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
[17] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
[18] O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33(3):267-79.
[19] Hoefel L, O'Connor AM, Lewis KB, et al. 20th anniversary update of the Ottawa decision support framework Part 1: a systematic review of the decisional needs of people making health or social decisions. Med Decis Making. 2020;40(5):555-81.
[20] Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, et al. PICO, PICOS, and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579.
[21] The World Bank. The World by Income and Region. Washington: World Bank; 2022. Available from: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/the-world-by-income-and-region.html
[22] Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, et al. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):223-30.
[23] Munakampe MN, Zulu JM, Michelo C. Contraception and abortion knowledge, attitudes, and practices among adolescents from low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):909.
[24] Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91-108.
[25] McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40-6.
[26] Gemzell-Danielsson K, Kubba A, Caetano C, et al. Thirty years of Mirena: a story of innovation and change in women's healthcare. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(4):614-8.
[27] Mack N, Crawford TJ, Guise JM, et al. Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4(4):CD004317.
[28] CADTH. SR/MA/HTA/ITC - CINAHL. In: CADTH Search Filters Database. Ottawa: CADTH; 2023. Available from: https://searchfilters.cadth.ca/link/98
[29] CADTH. SR/MA/HTA/ITC - MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo. In: CADTH Search Filters Database. Ottawa: CADTH; 2023. Available from: https://searchfilters.cadth.ca/link/33
[30] Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M, et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(6):699-710.
[31] Martin RW, Brogård Andersen S, O'Brien MA, et al. Providing balanced information about options in patient decision aids: an update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Med Decis Making. 2021;41(7):780-800.
[32] Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
[33] Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews. Adelaide: JBI; 2017. Available from:
https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Systematic_Reviews2017_0.pdf
[34] Baxter S, Blank L, Guillaume L, et al. Views of contraceptive service delivery to young people in the UK: a systematic review and thematic synthesis. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2011;37(2):71-84.
[35] Fox E, Reyna A, Malcolm NM, et al. Client preferences for contraceptive counseling: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(5):691-702.
[36] Reis YN, Vilela AL, de Souza Costa A, et al. Factors associated with adolescents' choice to use long-acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2018;7(4):153-62.
[37] Ti A, Soin K, Rahman T, et al. Contraceptive values and preferences of adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. Contraception. 2022;111:22-31.
[38] Daley AM. What influences adolescents' contraceptive decision-making? A meta-ethnography. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(6):614-32.
[39] Kirubarajan A, Li X, Yau M, et al. Awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of adolescents and young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(1):168-79.
[40] Jones A, Allison BA, Perry M. Effectiveness of contraceptive decision aids in adolescents and young adults: a systematic review. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2022;35(1):7-17.