magazinelogo

Sociology & Social Policy

ISSN Online: 3066-5698 CODEN:
Frequency: Instant publication Email: SSP@hillpublish.com
Total View: 224042 Downloads: 26534 Citations: 2 (From Dimensions)
ArticleOpen Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ssp.2026.06.004

Moral Injury and the Limits of Individualised Explanation: The Policy–Institution–Ethical Constraint (PIEC) Model and Five Questions

Robert A Allen*, Caroline Micklewright

Cranfield University, Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Shrivenham, SN6 8LA, UK.

*Corresponding author: Robert A Allen

Published: May 19,2026

Abstract

The concept of moral injury has gained increasing prominence in accounts of occupational distress among professionals working in public-sector and policy-facing roles. However, dominant framings within psychological and clinical literatures largely individualise moral injury, foregrounding personal transgression and emotional response while marginalising the structural role of social policy and institutional governance. As a result, moral injury is often treated as an outcome of individual experience rather than as a condition shaped by the or-ganisation and governance of work. This article argues that moral injury cannot be adequately understood without situating it within the policy environments and institutional arrangements that structure professional practice. Drawing on sociological perspectives on power, governance, and professional work, it identifies three recurring analytical absences in the literature: limited engagement with social policy, under-theorisation of institutional power and constraint, and neglect of the cumulative and iterative nature of ethical harm. This article intro-duces the Policy–Institution–Ethical Constraint (PIEC) model, a conceptual framework that explains how policy environments are translated into institutional practices that constrain professional discretion and normalise ethical compromise. The model reconceptualise moral injury as an individual psychological experience and as a condition that is often structurally produced, while also recognising the role of stabilisation and iterative feedback processes across policy, institutional, and professional levels. The article contributes to social policy scholarship by providing a framework for analysing how ethical harm is structurally produced and sustained, and by proposing a set of diagnostic ques-tions to guide institutional and policy analysis. It concludes by considering the implications of this reframing for policy responses that currently prioritise individual resilience over structural redesign.

Keywords

Moral Injury; Policy; Institution; Ethics

References

Ackroyd, S., & Thompson, P. (1999). Organizational misbehaviour. Sage.

Allen, R. A. (2026). Bearing witness to witnesses: developing the vicarious trauma reflexive sequence (VTRS) for emotionally demanding fieldwork. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1-14.

Austin, W. J., Kagan, L., Rankel, M., & Bergum, V. (2008). The balancing act: psychiatrists’ experience of moral distress. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 11(1), 89-97.

Beadle, E. S., Walecka, A., Sangam, A. V., Moorhouse, J., Winter, M., Munro Wild, H., ... & Casarin, A. (2024). Triggers and factors associated with moral distress and moral injury in health and social care workers: A systematic review of qualitative studies. PLoS One, 19(6), e0303013.

Brock, R. N., & Lettini, G. (2012). Soul repair: Recovering from moral injury after war. Beacon Press.

Bryan, C. J., Bryan, A. O., Roberge, E., Leifker, F. R., & Rozek, D. C. (2018). Moral injury, posttraumatic stress disorder, and suicidal behavior among National Guard personnel. Psychological trauma: theory, research, practice, and policy, 10(1), 36-45.

Čartolovni, A., Stolt, M., Scott, P. A., & Suhonen, R. (2021). Moral injury in healthcare professionals: A scoping review and discussion. Nursing ethics, 28(5), 590-602.

Currier, J. M., Holland, J. M., & Malott, J. (2015). Moral injury, meaning making, and mental health in returning veterans. Journal of clinical psychology, 71(3), 229-240.

Currier, J. M., & McCormick, W. H. (2020). Addressing moral injury in psychotherapy and counseling. In Moral Injury: A Guidebook for Understanding and Engagement (pp. 97-120). Lexington Books.

Davies, B. (2003). Death to critique and dissent? The policies and practices of new managerialism and of'evidence-based practice'. Gender and Education, 15(1), 91-103.

Davies, W. (2016). The limits of neoliberalism: Authority, sovereignty and the logic of competition. Sage.

Dean, W., Talbot, S., & Dean, A. (2019). Reframing clinician distress: moral injury not burnout. Federal Practitioner, 36(9), 400-402.

Denborough, D. (2021). Moral injury and moral repair: The possibilities of narrative practice. International Journal of Narrative Therapy & Community Work, 4, 24-58.

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Pantheon.

Frankfurt, S., & Frazier, P. (2016). A review of research on moral injury in combat veterans. Military psychology, 28(5), 318-330.

French, L., Hanna, P., & Huckle, C. (2022). “If I die, they do not care”: UK National Health Service staff experiences of betrayal-based moral injury during COVID-19. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 14(3), 516-524.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday.

Griffin, B. J., Purcell, N., Burkman, K., Litz, B. T., Bryan, C. J., Schmitz, M., ... & Maguen, S. (2019). Moral injury: An integrative review. Journal of traumatic stress, 32(3), 350-362.

Hanna, P., Erickson, M., & Walker, C. (2023). UK Higher Education staff experiences of moral injury during the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher education, 86(5), 985-1002.

Hodgson, T. J., & Carey, L. B. (2017). Moral injury and definitional clarity: Betrayal, spirituality and the role of chaplains. Journal of religion and health, 56(4), 1212-1228.

Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. Oxford University Press.

Jinkerson, J. D. (2016). Defining and assessing moral injury: A syndrome perspective. Traumatology, 22(2), 122-130.

Litz, B. T., Stein, N., Delaney, E., Lebowitz, L., Nash, W. P., Silva, C., & Maguen, S. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical psychology review, 29(8), 695-706.

Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Micklewright, C., & Allen, R. A. (2025). Female Veteran Transition: Exploring Gendered Power Relations, Discipline and Decision Making. Gender, Work & Organization, 32(1), 1-22.

Nash, W. P., Marino Carper, T. L., Mills, M. A., Au, T., Goldsmith, A., & Litz, B. T. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the moral injury events scale. Military medicine, 178(6), 646-652.

Oberg, G. (2025). Moral injury in teaching: the systemic roots of ethical conflict and emotional burnout in education. Educational Review, 1-24.

Powers, M., & Faden, R. R. (2006). Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. Oxford University Press.

Reis, D. S., & Lesandrini, J. D. (2025). Addressing moral distress and moral injury in healthcare: implications for workforce well-being and systemic change. Journal of Radiology Nursing.

Shay, J. (1994). Achilles in Vietnam: Combat trauma and the undoing of character. Simon and Schuster.

Shay, J. (2002). Odysseus in America: Combat trauma and the trials of homecoming. Simon and Schuster.

Sherman, N. (2015). Afterwar: Healing the moral wounds of our soldiers. Oxford University Press.

Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 23(1), 22-28.

Tronto, J. C. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press.

Copyright

© 2026 by the author(s).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) license, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not modified or adapted.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

How to cite this paper

Moral Injury and the Limits of Individualised Explanation: The Policy–Institution–Ethical Constraint (PIEC) Model and Five Questions

How to cite this paper: Robert A Allen, Caroline Micklewright. (2026). Moral Injury and the Limits of Individualised Explanation: The Policy–Institution–Ethical Con-straint (PIEC) Model and Five Questions. Sociology & Social Policy3(1), 27-38.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ssp.2026.06.004