magazinelogo

The Educational Review, USA

ISSN Print: 2575-7938 Downloads: 445138 Total View: 4791738
Frequency: monthly ISSN Online: 2575-7946 CODEN: TERUBB
Email: edu@hillpublisher.com
Article Open Access http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2018.02.005

Students’ Perceptions on the Implementation of Face-to-Face Tutorial in Distance Education System

Sri Yuniati Putri Koes Hardini1, Durri Andriani2

1Department of Math & Sciences, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia.

2Department of Education, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia.

*Corresponding author: Sri Yuniati Putri Koes Hardini

Published: March 5,2018

Abstract

Since 2013, Universitas Terbuka (UT) has been participated in ‘Bidikmisi’, a government of Indonesia program which provides scholarship for students in higher education institution. To be eligible, student must fresh graduate from senior high school, have good academic record in his/her senior high school, and faces financial limitations. Bear in mind the students’ limitation in self-directed learning, requirement to success in distance education environment, UT requires all ‘Bidikmisi’ students to attend an 8 week-sessions of face to face (F2F) tutorial sessions for all courses taken. This rather different approach is like a two-edged knife: positive if students accept this as beneficial to their learning process and negative if students consider this as reducing chances of doing other activities. To analyse students’ perception on this matter, questionnaires were developed and distributed to all ‘Bidikmisi’ students registered in the second semester of 2016. The questionnaires are focussed on studnets’ perception in three aspects, namely students’ discipline to attend and to hand-in assignments in F2F tutorial sessions, tutors’ quality, and role of F2F tutorial for mastering learning materials. During August-October 2016, the questionnaires were send to eight purposively chosen UT Regional Offices (ROs) and further distibuted to all Bidikmisi students in the UT ROs. A number of 366 students filled-out and returned the questionnaires. The results showed that almost all of the respondents attended the tutorial sessions, handed-in all assignment, perceived tutors as dsicipline and providing enough feedback, and the sessions helped the respondents doing their final exams.

References

Beasiswa Bidikmisi (Bidikmis Scholarship). Downloaded from https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Beasiswa_Bidikmisi on 10 April 2017.

Beasiswa. Downloaded from http://www.ut.ac.id/2015/78-tentang-ut/691-beasiswa on 10 April 2017.

Fung, Y & Carr, R. (2000). Face-to-face Tutorials in A Distance Learning System: Meeting Student Needs. Journal Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 15(1), pp 35-46 Downloaded from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/026805100115452? journalCode=copl20 on 20 April 2017.

Menggapai impian dengan Bidikmisi. 28 March 2017. Ministry of Reserach, Technology, and Higher Education, republic of Indones ia. Downloaded from http://dikti.go.id/menggapai-impian-dengan-bidikmisi/ on 1 April.

Putra, A.A.M.S. (2014). Face-to-face Tutorial Program in Distance Education: How Effective to Improve Students’ Performance. Doctoral Dissertation at College of Education, Florida State University.

Rahman, K.M.R. & Sadat, A. (2010) Analysis of Tutorial Services for Distance Learners: A Case of Bangladesh Open University.

Reddy, M. (1999). Distance Education in India. A Model for Developing Countries. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing.

The Commonwealth Education Hub. (2016). Funding Education: the Role of Scholarships, Bursaries and Other Mechanism. Discussion Summary.

Universitas Terbuka. (2017). Katalog UT 2017/2018 (UT Catalog 2017/2018). Banten: Universitas Terbuka.

How to cite this paper

Students' Perceptions on the Implementation of Face-to-Face Tutorial in Distance Education System

How to cite this paper: Sri Yuniati Putri Koes Hardini, Durri Andriani. (2018). Students' Perceptions on the Implementation of Face-to-Face Tutorial in Distance Education System. The Educational Review, USA, 2(2), 189-198.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2018.02.005