Hill Publishing Group | contact@hillpublisher.com

Hill Publishing Group

Location:Home / Journals / OAJRC Environmental Science /

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/oajrces.2021.10.001

The Carbon Footprint of Construction of Make-up Water Cooling System

Date: October 25,2021 |Hits: 310 Download PDF How to cite this paper

Chawalit Chanamai*, Narin Phaowanich

Power Plant Engineering Division, Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, Nontaburi, Thailand.

*Corresponding author: Chawalit Chanamai

Abstract

Recently, the international attention on environmental pollution. Population growth and economic growth are the main factor of power shortage and pollution problems. Reducing excessive emissions of greenhouse gas and climate change, carbon dioxide is favorite indicator to quantify emission pollutant in products or organization. Previous researches have focused on operational phase, while the construction industry is around one-third carbon emissions. Moreover, the previous studies estimated the carbon dioxide equivalent of the construction stage of the power plant was 1.54% of coal combustion. It is a challenge to reducing emission impact of the power plant. This research paper evaluates the carbon emissions during construction for a case study of construction of make-up water cooling system of the combined thermal power plant in Thailand. Carbon footprint was applied to estimate the carbon emissions. The amount of carbon equivalent were calculated according to the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method in three parts of construction: approach channel, cooling water intake pump house and cooling tower basin, which was the highest GHG emission part. The carbon footprint value of the construction of make-up water cooling system was 26,715.6 tCO2e or 2.448 tCO2e per square meter.

References

[1] Espinoza, M., N. Campo, R. Yang, H. Ozer, J. P. Aguiar-Moya, A. Baldi, L. G. Loría-Salazar, and I. L. Al-Qadi.  (2019).  Carbon Foot-print Estimation in Road Construction: La Abundancia Florencia Case Study. Sustainability, 2019, 11(8), 2276. 

[2] Thailand.  (2020).  Thailand third Biennial Updated Report (BUR), Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. 

[3] Energy Policy and Planning Office.  (2015).  Thailand Power Development Plan 2015-2036 (Revision 3). Ministry of Energy, Thailand. 

[4] Energy Policy and Planning Office.  (2018).  Thailand Power Development Plan 2018-2037 (Revision 1). Ministry of Energy, Thailand (Original in Thai). 

[5] TGO.  (2011).  Carbon Footprint Assessment Guidelines of Local Administrative Organizations, Carbon Footprint Promotion Project of Local Administrative Organizations, Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization: TGO) (Original in Thai). 

[6] TGO.  (2015).  Handbook of Carbon Footprint of Industrial Sector Organizations, Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (Public Organization: TGO) (Original in Thai). 

[7] IPCC.  (2006).  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).  https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/. 

[8] ADB.  (2010).  Methodology for Estimating Carbon Footprint of Road Projects Case Study: India.  Asian Development Bank. 

[9] Wang, C. and X. Tan.  (2012).  Estimating Carbon Footprint in the Construction Process of a Green Educational Building, Proceedings of 2012 Int.  Conf. on Construction and Real Estate Management.  Kansas City, USA, 1-2/Oct.  2012, Vol. 1, pp. 175-179. 

[10] Kong, A., H. Kang, S. He, N. Li, and W. Wang.  (2020).  Study on the Carbon Emissions in the Whole Construction Process of Prefabricated Floor Slab.  Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 2326. 

[11] Sun, H. and Y. Park.  (2020).  CO2 Emission Calculation Method during Construction Process for Developing BIM-Based Performance Evaluation System.  Applied Sciences, 2020, 10, 5587. 

[12] http://thaicarbonlabel.tgo.or.th/index.php?lang=TH&mod=Y0hKdlpIVmpkSE5mWlcxcGMzTnBiMjQ9. 

[13] http://conference.tgo.or.th/download/tgo_or_th/seminar/presentation/2010/221110/ CarbonIntensity_KMUTT.pdf. 

[14] SECOT.  (2017).  Environment Impact Assessment Report for Project or Activity which may seriously Affect Community with respect to Environmental Quality, Natural Resources and Health (Executive Summary Report) of Bang Pakong Combined Cycle (Unit 1-2 Re-placement) Project, SECOT Co., Ltd. (Original in Thai). 

[15] Limphitakphong, N., P. Thaipradit, P. Kanchanapiya, T. Tantisattayakul, and O. Chavalparit.  (2020).  Embodied Carbon Emission of Construction Materials: A Case Study of Building in Thailand, Special Issue on Science, Engineering and Environment.  International Journal of GEOMATE, April, 2020, Vol. 18, Issue 68, pp. 187-193. 

[16] Nithisakdiyanond, N. and J. Rukijkanpanich.  (2017).  Carbon Footprint Assessment of the Construction Project of the Subway Station and Tunnel.  Engineering Journal Chiang Mai University, 2017, 24(2), 114-127 (Original in Thai).

How to cite this paper

The Carbon Footprint of Construction of Make-up Water Cooling System

How to cite this paper: Chawalit Chanamai, Narin Phaowanich. (2021) The Carbon Footprint of Construction of Make-up Water Cooling System. OAJRC Environmental Science2(1), 1-6.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/oajrces.2021.10.001

Volumes & Issues

Free HPG Newsletters

Add your e-mail address to receive free newsletters from Hill Publishing Group.

Contact us

Hill Publishing Group

8825 53rd Ave

Elmhurst, NY 11373, USA

E-mail: contact@hillpublisher.com

Copyright © 2019 Hill Publishing Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.