News Release

"International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture" Article Recommendation | In-depth Analysis of Abiotic Stresses' Impact on Crops

May 08,2025 Views: 205

Amidst the intensifying climate crisis, global agriculture is grappling with unprecedented challenges. Abiotic stresses, such as extreme temperatures, drought, flooding, soil salinity, and heavy metal pollution, are severely restricting crop yields and quality, and are even threatening global food security. Have we found effective ways to combat these environmental challenges?

Suresh Kumar from the Indian Agricultural Research Institute provides insights in his article published in the "International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture."

Website screenshot

This paper has been cited 125 times since its publication:

(The screenshot shows that the paper has been cited 125 times on Google Scholar)

The study, backed by extensive experimental data and field observations, delves into the physiological and biochemical changes in crops under abiotic stress. The findings are alarming: high temperatures and drought can reduce crop yields by 50-70%, while also significantly lowering the protein, starch, and oil content in agricultural products. For example, under drought conditions, the gluten quality in wheat declines, affecting flour's baking properties. High temperatures, on the other hand, cause abnormal accumulation of storage proteins in rice, reducing its nutritional value. These results not only expose the direct impact of abiotic stresses on crop yields but also reveal their far-reaching effects on the quality of agricultural products.

The article also notes that abiotic stresses disrupt the oxidative balance within plants, leading to an overaccumulation of reactive oxygen species. This, in turn, damages biomolecules such as membranes, proteins, and nucleic acids. Taking soil salinity as an example, excessive sodium ions interfere with the osmotic balance of plant cells, compromise membrane integrity, and ultimately reduce photosynthetic efficiency and respiratory function.

Despite these challenges, plants have evolved a range of mechanisms to cope with abiotic stresses. They regulate stomatal opening and closing to reduce water loss, activate antioxidant enzyme systems to eliminate excess reactive oxygen species, and synthesize protective substances such as heat shock proteins, dehydrins, and proline to maintain cellular stability. These physiological regulatory mechanisms provide a theoretical basis for breeding crops with stronger stress resistance.

This research integrates methods from physiology, molecular biology, and genetics, enhancing our understanding of plant responses to abiotic stresses and offering direction for developing new crop varieties that are highly productive, stress-resistant, and high-quality. The article proposes that future research should focus on exploring the functions of stress resistance genes in plants, deciphering their regulatory networks, and employing genetic engineering and epigenetic modifications to boost crop resilience.

Food security is the cornerstone of global stability and development. In the face of climate change, we urgently need technological breakthroughs to ensure stable crop production and quality. Although the road ahead is challenging, Kumar's research offers new hope and inspiration. We look forward to more scientists contributing to this field and working together to build a more sustainable and resilient agricultural ecosystem.

# Climate change # abiotic stress # food security # crop resilience # sustainable agricultural development

The study was published in International Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Hill Publishing Group

https://www.hillpublisher.com/ArticleDetails/388   

How to cite this paper

Suresh Kumar. (2020) Abiotic Stresses and Their Effects on Plant Growth, Yield and Nutritional Quality of Agricultural Produce. International Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 4(4), 367-378.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2020.12.002 

Visits: 18637; citations: 125